Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] SRP: don't use TX IU after freeing it

2005-09-29 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:42:27AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Vu> Have you reviewed the FMR? What your take on Christoph's point > Vu> about the high bit of dma_address_ts are used by some > Vu> platforms IOMMU - I think that it's OK since FMR code only > Vu> touch the lower bit

[openib-general] Sending/Receiving MAD packets from user-space.

2005-09-29 Thread Abhijit Gadgil
Hi All, I am trying to use MAD services from a user-land application. Basically I want to do few things like registering to traps/generating Multicast Send requests from user-space using Userspace VAPI. After reading through some code in osmtest.c, I couldn't figure out whether it is using the

[openib-general] CMA and device removal

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
I'd like to get some feedback about the following design change to the CMA. Currently, a user receives a device GUID and port number as part of address resolution. The user matches the GUID to an existing device and creates a cma_id associated with that device. I'm considering the following alte

RE: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
>I think the usage model is the following: you have some magic device >that has an IB port on one side and "something else" on the other >side. Think of something like a gateway that talks SDP on the IB side >and TCP/IP on the other side. > >You configure your IPoIB routing so that this magic devi

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Roland Dreier
Sean> Can you explain how RDMA works in this case? This is simply Sean> performing IP routing, and not IB routing, correct? Are you Sean> referring to a protocol running on top of IP or IB directly? Sean> Is the router establishing a second reliable connection on Sean> the bac

[openib-general] [EMAIL PROTECTED]>7]G=?M$4MQC#$G$9(B

2005-09-29 Thread info
$B(B $B(#(!(!($(#(!(!($(B $B(B $B("40A4("("L5NA("(B $B(B $B(&(!(!(%(&(!(!(%(B $B(#(!(!($(#(!(!($(#(!(!($(B $B("M-L>("("?M!*("(">R2p("(B

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] SRP: don't use TX IU after freeing it

2005-09-29 Thread Vu Pham
Roland, Vu> Since all the tuned parameter are target-centralized (passing Vu> in when add new target) I think about moving FMR resources Vu> (size, max_page...) ie. fmr_pool into srp_target_port Vu> struct. Each newly added target will have their own customized Vu> FMR po

[openib-general] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient file blocking settings matched and action taken.

2005-09-29 Thread Administrator
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = openib-general@openib.org Subject = [openib-general] fnfetceueegbftqoi Scanning time = 9/29/2005 3:49:02 PM Action on file blocking: The attachment email-details.zip matches the file blocking sett

[openib-general] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2005-09-29 Thread Administrator
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s). Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = openib-general@openib.org Subject = [openib-general] fnfetceueegbftqoi Scanning time = 9/29/2005 5:48:24 PM Engine/Pattern = 7.510-1002/2.865.00 Action on virus found: The attachme

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Yaron Haviv wrote: The RC connection is established with the DGID of the router (it's the equivalent of a MAC address and its ok), the ServiceID + private data in the case of SDP or iSER (or NFS-R assuming the IBTA proposal will pass) also contains info on the REAL destination IP that can be used

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:58, Sean Hefty wrote: > As an aside, do the IPoIB subnets all fall into the same broadcast domain? That would depend on the PKey, right ? -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailm

Re: [Fwd: [openib-general] [ANNOUCE] OpenIB OpenSM: trunk now supports 1.8.0 features]

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 16:18, Sean Hubbell wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > >Hi Sean, > > > >On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:03, Sean Hubbell wrote: > > > > > >> We are having problems with loading the mthca module running Linux > >>2.6.13 Kernel with the svn repository pulled yesterday afternoon wh

RE: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Yaron Haviv
> -Original Message- > From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 5:16 PM > To: Yaron Haviv > Cc: Hal Rosenstock; Openib > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP > > Yaron Haviv wrote: > > 4. send an arp on the net device f

Re: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas Moschny
On Thursday 29 September 2005 23:44, you wrote: > I would try 2 nodes point to point. If that works, then > I suspect the switch. I did see an issue with one of our MT2400 switches > with IPoIB connectivity. We replaced the switch and it > seemed to fix the problem, so we did not investigate furthe

RE: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Woodruff, Robert J
Hal wrote, >> > Also, what is your HCA firmware version ? >> >> $ cat /sys/class/infiniband/mthca0/fw_ver >> 3.3.3 >That's the most recent. >-- Hal I would try 2 nodes point to point. If that works, then I suspect the switch. I did see an issue with one of our MT2400 switches with IPoIB connec

Re: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:01, Thomas Moschny wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2005 22:08, you wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 16:01, Thomas Moschny wrote: > > > Maybe a switch firmware problem? We once observed a complete switch > > > lockup that shut down all communication. > > > > Could be. Do y

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Yaron Haviv wrote: 4. send an arp on the net device find destination MAC Note the destination IP in the ARP phase is either the REAL destination IP in case of a local subnet, or the IP router IP address in case of a gateway/router. 5. issue a path record between the source/dest GIDs (DGID taken

RE: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Yaron Haviv
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:openib-general- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:58 PM > To: Hal Rosenstock > Cc: Openib > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP > > Hal Rosenstock wrote:

Re: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas Moschny
On Thursday 29 September 2005 22:08, you wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 16:01, Thomas Moschny wrote: > > Maybe a switch firmware problem? We once observed a complete switch > > lockup that shut down all communication. > > Could be. Do you know what rev of firmware you are running ? Is it 0.7.0 > ?

RE: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Woodruff, Robert J
>Also, what is your HCA firmware version ? >-- Hal Good point. I have seen IPoIB connectivity issues in the past when dealing with down rev FW. I just re-tested IPoIB on my IPF machines and they seem to work OK for me. I suspect either the HCA FW rev or the switch. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]# ca

RE: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Woodruff, Robert J
Thomas wrote, >Yes, it's a single MTS-2400 with 24 ports. >Maybe a switch firmware problem? We once observed a complete switch lockup >that shut down all communication. If you suspect a bad switch, do you have another one you could try ? or you can try to direct connect a couple of nodes. woo

Re: [Fwd: [openib-general] [ANNOUCE] OpenIB OpenSM: trunk now supports 1.8.0 features]

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hubbell
Hal Rosenstock wrote: Hi Sean, On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:03, Sean Hubbell wrote: We are having problems with loading the mthca module running Linux 2.6.13 Kernel with the svn repository pulled yesterday afternoon when we are booting. What problem is occuring with loading mthca duri

Re: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 16:01, Thomas Moschny wrote: > Maybe a switch firmware problem? We once observed a complete switch lockup > that shut down all communication. Could be. Do you know what rev of firmware you are running ? Is it 0.7.0 ? (MTS-2400 is Anafa-2 based). Also, what is your HCA firmw

Re: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas Moschny
On Thursday 29 September 2005 21:25, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > In the log, I do see several nodes successfully join the IPoIB broadcast > group and the multicast tree for this got setup (I didn't actually > validate the tree itself). > > PortGid.0xfe80 : 0x0002c9021575

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-09-29 Thread Robert Walsh
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:44 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Just so we don't forget, we need to add something like this to the > uverbs code on your branch. Yup. It's on my TODO list. I need to take care of some unrelated stuff today, but I'll get back to working on all the feedback I've received

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-09-29 Thread Roland Dreier
Just so we don't forget, we need to add something like this to the uverbs code on your branch. (I didn't even compile test but you get the idea...) --- src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c (revision 3620) +++ src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c (working copy) @@ -11

Re: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 15:11, Thomas Moschny wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2005 20:32, you wrote: > > Can you ping the subnet broadcast address (e.g. ping -b 192.168.0.255 if > > the ib0 is 192.168.0.x) ? > > The only answer I get is from the sender itself: > > $ ping -b 192.168.204.255 > WAR

Re: [openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote: I am not very clear about this -what happens when the ARP cache is empty on the active side and IPoIB module has also been unloaded? Is the IP translation information stored somewhere by the CMA, permitting the application to continue? If the route is not found in

Re: [openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

2005-09-29 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
I am not very clear about this -what happens when the ARP cache is empty on the active side and IPoIB module has also been unloaded? Is the IP translation information stored somewhere by the CMA, permitting the application to continue? Pradeep [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/29/2

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Hal Rosenstock wrote: I'm struggling with understanding how translation can even occur in this case. What DGID is used when querying for the path record, and how is it obtained? Isn't it the DGID of the next hop IP router ? (I suppose in the case of multiple IPoIB subnets on the same IB subnet,

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:38, Sean Hefty wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >>If we restrict IB to a single subnet, do we need to worry about IP routing? > >> My > >>assumption was no. Is this an invalid assumption? > > > > I think so. There is nothing that precludes having multiple IPoIB > > subn

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Hal Rosenstock wrote: If we restrict IB to a single subnet, do we need to worry about IP routing? My assumption was no. Is this an invalid assumption? I think so. There is nothing that precludes having multiple IPoIB subnets on the same IB subnet. This seems similar to having multiple IP su

Re: [openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:00, Thomas Moschny wrote: > Hi, > > Do I have to do something special in order to configure IPoverIB besides > from loading the ib_ipoib kernel module (and it's dependencies), and calling > ifconfig ib0 up? No, that should be sufficient. > On our machines, the module

Re: [Fwd: [openib-general] [ANNOUCE] OpenIB OpenSM: trunk now supports 1.8.0 features]

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Sean, On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:03, Sean Hubbell wrote: > We are having problems with loading the mthca module running Linux > 2.6.13 Kernel with the svn repository pulled yesterday afternoon when we > are booting. What problem is occuring with loading mthca during boot ? > Once we boot,

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:57, Sean Hefty wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Would it require global routing, > >>> > >>>Yes. > >> > >>If it requires global routing of IB, then I think that we should defer it > >>until > >>global routing is available. At least this was my original thinking. > >

Re: [openib-general] ib_cm_listen failure

2005-09-29 Thread Todd Bowman
This worked.  On 9/29/05, Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Todd Bowman wrote:> I've tracked the error to ib_cm_listen:...> These are the modules I have loaded:>> ib_sdp 93792  0Can you unload SDP and see if you see the same issue?  (SDP reserves a range of listen addresses that

Re: [Fwd: [openib-general] [ANNOUCE] OpenIB OpenSM: trunk now supports 1.8.0 features]

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hubbell
Hal, We are having problems with loading the mthca module running Linux 2.6.13 Kernel with the svn repository pulled yesterday afternoon when we are booting. Once we boot, we get passed this but we have problems when attempting to run ibping. The log files are 1.4M. Would you like me to send

[openib-general] IPoIB configuration

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas Moschny
Hi, Do I have to do something special in order to configure IPoverIB besides from loading the ib_ipoib kernel module (and it's dependencies), and calling ifconfig ib0 up? On our machines, the modules load fine, opensm runs, ports are in active state, no error messages from ifconfig. However,

[openib-general] RE: [PATCH] uDAPL build fix for OS vendor variations of IA64_FETCHADD

2005-09-29 Thread James Lentini
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Arlin Davis wrote: > Yes. I am not an autogen/configure expert so I will defer. > > In the meantime we need to change things around to build with the latest > changes with no OS_VENDER. Committed in revision 3619. ___ openib-gen

Re: [openib-general] ib_cm_listen failure

2005-09-29 Thread Arlin Davis
Todd Bowman wrote: I am runing udapl on 32bit intel and running into this error: setup_listener(conn=0x8060008 cm_id=134611368) destroy_cm_id: conn 0x8060008 id 134611368 --> dapl_psp_create setup_conn_listener failed: 3 20664 Error dat_psp_create: DAT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES 20664 Error co

Re: [openib-general] ib_cm_listen failure

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Todd Bowman wrote: I've tracked the error to ib_cm_listen: ... These are the modules I have loaded: ib_sdp 93792 0 Can you unload SDP and see if you see the same issue? (SDP reserves a range of listen addresses that can cause other listen calls to fail. Not sure it's the

Re: [openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
James Lentini wrote: of the CMA API is fine. However, ATS is needed for interoperability with existing kDAPL and uDAPL installations. Note that we lose interoperability between the CMA and kDAPL. - Sean ___ openib-general mailing list openib-genera

[openib-general] RE: [PATCH] uDAPL build fix for OS vendor variations of IA64_FETCHADD

2005-09-29 Thread Arlin Davis
> >Committed in revision 3606 except for this: > >> Index: dapl/udapl/Makefile >> === >> --- dapl/udapl/Makefile (revision 3565) >> +++ dapl/udapl/Makefile (working copy) >> @@ -57,6 +57,13 @@ >> endif >> >> # >> +# Set up

Re: [openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

2005-09-29 Thread James Lentini
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Sean Hefty wrote: > Roland Dreier wrote: > > Guy> But the main question is: does openib wants to support ATS > > Guy> arp ? do we also want to support ATS > > Guy> registration/deregistration ? openib can support, for > > Guy> example, only the ATS arp and r

Re: [openib-general] Re: [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: I'd suggest you also take a look at sdp_link.c - I hear that's where ib_at code came from, and I think it does some things in a better way - such as only keeping device reference around for a short while only. Thanks for pointing this out. I wasn't aware that SDP did

[openib-general] ib_cm_listen failure

2005-09-29 Thread Todd Bowman
I am runing udapl on 32bit intel and running into this error: setup_listener(conn=0x8060008 cm_id=134611368)  destroy_cm_id: conn 0x8060008 id 134611368 --> dapl_psp_create setup_conn_listener failed: 3 20664 Error dat_psp_create: DAT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES 20664 Error connect_ep: DAT_INSUFFIC

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Hal Rosenstock wrote: Would it require global routing, Yes. If it requires global routing of IB, then I think that we should defer it until global routing is available. At least this was my original thinking. I was referring to IP not IB routing. If we restrict IB to a single subnet, d

Re: [openib-general] Same IP address on multiple net devices and routing

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:48, Roland Dreier wrote: > Hal> Hi, Does anyone know what the Linux routing code does in > Hal> terms of selecting an outgoing interface when multiple net > Hal> devices have been configured with the same IP address ? > > It follows the routing table. If you a

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:40, Sean Hefty wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >>How does that map to the IB subnet? > > > > or IP subnet in the case of iWARP, right ? It's still an outgoing > > interface just more than 1 IP hop away. > > The intent of the module is only to deal with IB. Although, it

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] SRP: don't use TX IU after freeing it

2005-09-29 Thread Roland Dreier
Vu> Since all the tuned parameter are target-centralized (passing Vu> in when add new target) I think about moving FMR resources Vu> (size, max_page...) ie. fmr_pool into srp_target_port Vu> struct. Each newly added target will have their own customized Vu> FMR pool. That makes

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Hal Rosenstock wrote: How does that map to the IB subnet? or IP subnet in the case of iWARP, right ? It's still an outgoing interface just more than 1 IP hop away. The intent of the module is only to deal with IB. Although, it seems generic enough that it could return hardware addresses for

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] SRP: don't use TX IU after freeing it

2005-09-29 Thread Vu Pham
Roland Dreier wrote: Vu, you pointed out that the current SRP code might look at an IU that it sent after that IU has been reused for a different command. I realized that a simple fix for this is just to keep the DMA address (the only thing we look at in the IU) in the request structure. Just

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:05, Sean Hefty wrote: > > What happens if the destination IP address is a local one ? I think > > there is some missing code here. > > I think there's code in at.c to handle that case that could be re-used. Yes. This is the code related to ip_dev_find which has been discu

RE: [openib-general] 2.6.9 backport

2005-09-29 Thread Woodruff, Robert J
Thomas wrote, >Hi, >while building a 2.6.9-11.EL kernel with the patches from >gen2/branches/backport-to-2.6.9 applied, I found a minor glitch: >CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPOIB_DEBUG should not be there. The debug part cannot be >build, because debugfs is missing. It seems to be introduced in 2.6.11.

[openib-general] Re: [git pull] InfiniBand fixes for 2.6.14

2005-09-29 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 06:44:55AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Greg> I didn't think that git pulls were going to be allowed from > Greg> subsystem maintainers after -rc1 came out. After that, > Greg> patches by email were required to be sent, not git pulls. > Greg> This does caus

[openib-general] 2.6.9 backport

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas Moschny
Hi, while building a 2.6.9-11.EL kernel with the patches from gen2/branches/backport-to-2.6.9 applied, I found a minor glitch: CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPOIB_DEBUG should not be there. The debug part cannot be build, because debugfs is missing. It seems to be introduced in 2.6.11. - Thomas pgpLw1cO

Re: [openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: BTW, one idea of mine that some people apparently were interested in, is adding an option to do ARP resolution on the passive side after REQ is received, as a weak security measure. Is there still interest in that? I don't think that there's anything to restrict this.

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Hal Rosenstock wrote: (We should be able to pull that from ib_at.) or sdp_link which has the more temporal netdev references currently :-) I will look at both. Thanks. The API is similar to the route portion of ib_at, but corrects issues with canceling requests. What are you referring to

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Sean Hefty
Sean Hefty wrote: struct ib_addr_svc* ib_addr_create_svc(void *context, ib_addr_handler handler); void ib_addr_destroy_svc(struct ib_addr_svc *svc); On second thought, I think this can be done without the need to create/destroy a service without changing the functionality. void ib_addr_can

Re: [openib-general] Same IP address on multiple net devices and routing

2005-09-29 Thread Roland Dreier
Hal> Hi, Does anyone know what the Linux routing code does in Hal> terms of selecting an outgoing interface when multiple net Hal> devices have been configured with the same IP address ? It follows the routing table. If you assign the same local IP address to multiple interfaces then

Re: [openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

2005-09-29 Thread James Lentini
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > BTW, one idea of mine that some people apparently were interested in, > is adding an option to do ARP resolution on the passive side after REQ is > received, as a weak security measure. > > Is there still interest in that? Given that the ARP res

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 09:59, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:26, Sean Hefty wrote: > > Here's a first attempt at an API / implementation (that compiles only) for > > an address translation module for IB using ARP. The code should check the > > ARP cache for information, but is mis

[openib-general] Same IP address on multiple net devices and routing

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi, Does anyone know what the Linux routing code does in terms of selecting an outgoing interface when multiple net devices have been configured with the same IP address ? Does it always select the first one or is there some other algorithm in play here ? Thanks. -- Hal ___

Re: [openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

2005-09-29 Thread Guy German
Sean Hefty wrote: I don't object to the name, just combining the current functionality that ib_at tries to provide into a single abstraction. I think that the disagreement is what functionality a core address translation module should provide. ... > If other functionality from ib_at is needed

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:26, Sean Hefty wrote: > Here's a first attempt at an API / implementation (that compiles only) for > an address translation module for IB using ARP. The code should check the > ARP cache for information, but is missing the actual ARP processing. Where would the path recor

RE: [openib-general] segfault on openib mvapich

2005-09-29 Thread Christoph A. Mordasini
Hi We are running here mvapich gen 2 downloaded from osu about Sept. 12., with 2.6.12.6 from kernel.org, Fedora core 4 (gcc 4.0.0) and the IB tree from openib.org downloaded about 3 weeks ago, without any subsequent patches added. The hardware of the cluster is somewhat special: We use AMD dual

[openib-general] $B%5%$%I%S%8%M%9$K$$$+$,$G$9$+!)(B

2005-09-29 Thread info
$B!|5U%G%j%X%k$C$F$4B8CN$G$9$+!)(Bhttp://1191.jp/lvhost/index.html [EMAIL PROTECTED]@$7$?$7$^$9$H!"%[%F%k!"$b$7$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]<+Bp$K$F!"[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]&;[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!|IaDL$N%G%j%X%k$H$O0[$J$k$N$O=P8~$/B&$b$"$kDxEY!"Ajhttp://1191.jp/lvhost/index.html $B!|6b3[LL

RE: [openib-general] segfault on openib mvapich

2005-09-29 Thread Sacerdoti, Federico
I found my problem, which had to do with incorrect library loading (LD_LIBRARY_PATH). There was a different mvapich (0.9.5) being loaded instead of the new one. Perhaps a version check with a nice error message could help in the future. However, mvapich gen2 works just fine according to my prelimi

[openib-general] building the userspace rpm on ia64

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas Moschny
Hi! In order to build the openib-userspace rpm on rhel4/ia64, I had to slightly modify the specfile. Here's the patch: --- openib-userspace.spec.orig 2005-09-29 15:02:42.961550300 +0200 +++ openib-userspace.spec 2005-09-29 15:03:09.500216310 +0200 @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ %config /etc/modprob

[openib-general] Re: Page allocation failures & kdapltest oops

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:01, James Lentini wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > What are the contents of /etc/cpuinfo and > > > /etc/meminfo on this system? > > > > Those files don't exist on my machine. > > Sorry, I meant /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id

[openib-general] Re: IBIS modification

2005-09-29 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Eitan, On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 06:40, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > Hi Hal, > > I have updated IBIS : > > 1. Support sm_key, v_key What's v_key ? > and m_key (yes the last one is temporary until we > >will need to support m_key(lid), m_key(dr path), m_key(guid). > >to set them (anytime du

[openib-general] IBIS modification

2005-09-29 Thread Eitan Zahavi
Title: IBIS modification Hi Hal, I have updated IBIS : 1. Support sm_key, v_key and m_key (yes the last one is temporary until we    will need to support m_key(lid), m_key(dr path), m_key(guid).    to set them (anytime during the flow) you can ibis_opts configure -sm_key Example: % ibi

[openib-general] Re: [RFC] IB address translation using ARP

2005-09-29 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: [RFC] IB address translation using ARP > The code should check the > ARP cache for information, but is missing the actual ARP processing. > (We should be able to pull that from ib_at.) I'd suggest you also take a look at sdp_link.c - I hear tha