Hi,
While doing some work to have linux bonding driver be able to work on top
of IPoIB i have run into LOC_QP_OP_ERR with vendor (mellanox PCIX HCA) error 62.
ib0: failed send event (status=2, wrid=52 vend_err 62)
What does this vendor error means? its the same system over which i saw th
>
> I have 3 nodes connected via IB as shown below:
>
> node1 ---> switch1 ---> node2
> |--> node3
>
> If node1 sends a brodcast message to node2 and node3, I want to know if
> the
> message is delivered to the switch twice (first time for node2 and second
> time for no
>/usr/bin/ld: warning: libibverbs.so.1, needed by
>/usr/local/lib/librdmacm.so, may conflict with libibverbs.so.2
>
>Does rdmacm use the older version of ibverbs or do I need to install
>rdmacm differently?
I keep the RDMA CM updated with the latest version of verbs. There may be an
issue with th
>ok, thanks for clarifying that, is cancellation allowed only for address
>resolution or also for route resolving and/or CM calls? also how about
>documenting this?
Cancellation is allowed for any asynchronous operation. I will pull in your
patch when I get back in the office. Thanks.
- Sean
_
Christian - Thanks for sending instructions for running mvapich2-0.9.5
to Tziporet.
Tziporet - Thanks for looking into this problem on SLES9 environment.
Please note that a detailed user guide for running and tuning MVAPICH2
0.9.5 is available from the following URL:
http://nowlab.cse.ohio-state
Hi Tziporet,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:55:02PM +0300, Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Can you explain me how to run mvapich2-0.9.5?
at first, simple compiling using the OSU scripts (make.mvapich2.gen2) -
should work out of the box. (except you will use PCI-X HCAs - you'll
have to ommit "-DSRQ" in the bui
Hi Sean,
I installed the latest kernel:2.6.17.11 and the latest ib stack: rev 9240
When I compile programs with rdmacm library, I get the error: (though the
program runs fine...)
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libibverbs.so.1, needed by
/usr/local/lib/librdmacm.so, may conflict with libibverbs.so.2
Does
Can you explain me how to run mvapich2-0.9.5?
Thanks,
Tziporet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Guggenberger
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 6:25 PM
To: Tziporet Koren
Cc: Eli Cohen; Christian Guggenberger; OPENIB
Subject: Re: [o
There is new osm_log initializer osm_log_init_v2(), this is wrapped
by osm_log_init() in order to preserve existing API.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diags/src/saquery.c |4 ++--
osm/complib/cl_event_wheel.c |2 +-
osm/include/opensm/osm_log.h | 29
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:58:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.18-rc4-mm3:
>...
> git-infiniband.patch
>...
> git trees.
>...
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make the following needlessly global functions static:
- c2_ae.c: to_qp_state_str()
-
> >>We test here SLES9 but with mvapich1 library 0.9.7 version from OFED.
> >>We tried to run here the test you attached on mvapich1 but have not seen
> >>this failure.
> >>Can you try to reproduce with mvapich1 version?
> >>
> >
> >is it also okay if I tried with plain mvapich1 from OSU ?
> I
Christian Guggenberger wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We test here SLES9 but with mvapich1 library 0.9.7 version from OFED.
>> We tried to run here the test you attached on mvapich1 but have not seen
>> this failure.
>> Can you try to reproduce with mvapich1 version?
>>
>
> is it also okay if I tried with
Hi,
> >Attached is a simple MPI code that causes the hard lock. Also attached
> >are some Kernel BUGs gathered via serial console - they look garbled,
> >unfortunately.
> >Note, everything is fine, if I use recent vanilla kernels on that SLES9
> >machine.
> >
> >cheers.
> > - Christian
> >
> Hi,
Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:49:32PM +0300, Tziporet Koren wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> In testing today we found that on SLES9 SP3 memory locking as a regular
>> user fails.
>>
> has any progress been made regarding this ?
>
> I'd like to ask if the SLES9 por
Hi,
I have 3 nodes connected via IB as shown below:
node1 ---> switch1 ---> node2
|--> node3
If node1 sends a brodcast message to node2 and node3, I want to know if the message is delivered to the switch twice (first time for node2 and second time for node3) or jus
Quoting r. Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] IPoIB fails attaching QP to mcast group
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting r. Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> ib0: join completion for ff12:401b:::::: (status 0)
> >> ib_mthca :02:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> ib0: join completion for ff12:401b:::::: (status 0)
>> ib_mthca :02:00.0: modify QP 3->3 returned status 10.
>> ib0: failed to modify QP, ret = -22
>> ib0: couldn't attach QP to multicast group
>
Quoting r. Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: [openib-general] IPoIB fails attaching QP to mcast group
>
> Michael, Roland,
>
> Any idea what can cause the below, what actually is the error i am running
> into here?
>
> ib0: join completion for ff12:401b:::::: (s
Michael, Roland,
Any idea what can cause the below, what actually is the error i am running into
here?
ib0: join completion for ff12:401b:::::: (status 0)
ib_mthca :02:00.0: modify QP 3->3 returned status 10.
ib0: failed to modify QP, ret = -22
ib0: couldn't attach QP
Thanks,
We found the problem it caused by the huge pages support we added in
RC3.
Was fixed and will be in RC4
Tziporet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Robert J
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 12:15 AM
To: Woodruff, Robert J;
Roland Dreier wrote:
> Sean> This patch set appears to be the preferred approach. Any
> Sean> objection to committing this?
>
> It's unfortunate that we have to add a special-case event hook for the
> CM, but I guess the iWARP CM changes are so ugly anyway it doesn't
> matter much. So I
21 matches
Mail list logo
