This uDAPL patch adds both dapltest and dtest utilities, including manual
pages, to the DAPL project
build. The dapltest required some modifications to build on x86_64.
James, please review.
Signed-off by: Arlin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 1190f20..e2bf4
thanks, queued for 2.6.21
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
thanks, queued for 2.6.21
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch do I
generate a patch against?
- Sean
---
rdma_cm: remove unused node_guid from cma_device structure.
ib_cm: remove ca_guid from cm_device structure.
rdma_cm: request reversible paths only.
ib_core: Set hop limit in ib_init_ah
> Newer gccs have the -fwhole-program --combine options that address
> this and more. One of the things that happens is that all internal
> functions are made 'static' and all compilation units are optimized in
> one go.
Good point... but is there any sane way to use that feature with
automake
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 17:18, Sean Hefty wrote:
> >>Can someone help my understanding here? Is ipoib joining a multicast group
> >>using the full membership PKey, even if the node that it joins from only
> >>has the
> >>limited membership PKey configured? And the code in ib_find_cached_pkey
> >>h
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 17:18, Sean Hefty wrote:
> >>Can someone help my understanding here? Is ipoib joining a multicast group
> >>using the full membership PKey, even if the node that it joins from only
> >>has the
> >>limited membership PKey configured? And the code in ib_find_cached_pkey
> >>h
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 18:35, Sean Hefty wrote:
> >Doesn't this allow ipoib to join a multicast group for which it may not be
> >able
> >to communicate with all members? For the broadcast group, this seems like an
> >error to me. Can ipoib work in such a configuration? If all nodes were
> >assig
> Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] libmthca: optimize calls to htonl with constant parameter
>
> > So what is different in your setup that causes this patch to make a
> > difference for you?
>
> Hmm. I agree it is somewhat strange.
>
> Below is a simple test
> So what is different in your setup that causes this patch to make a
> difference for you?
Hmm. I agree it is somewhat strange.
Below is a simple test that attempts to compare htonl, CONSTANT_HTONL,
and an array-driven implementation. The code line is taken directly from htonl.
Could you compile
-2.6.17
Passed on ia64 with linux-2.6.14
Passed on x86_64 with linux-2.6.18-1.2798.fc6
Failed:
Build failed on ia64 with linux-2.6.16.21-0.8-default
Log:
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_kernel-20070223-0200_linux-2.6.16.21-0.8-default_ia64_check/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h:1590:
error: implicit declaration of
11 matches
Mail list logo
