> It's not pretty I admit. pci_find_next_ht_capability() would also take a
> ttl, and pass it through to pci_find_next_capability(). AFAICT that
> would avoid any infinite hang scenarios?
What if we didn't try to solve a problem we don't have ?
Have we yet encountered an HT device with that sort
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 08:52 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I'm surprised that something as recent as infiniband requires a
> > long-deprecated function bus_to_virt().
> >
> > What is it trying to do there that needs that call ?
>
> Don't ask -- just enjoy the fact that you don't know about t
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 18:33 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a heads-up, drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_keys.c doesn't build
> on powerpc because we have don't have bus_to_virt().
>
> (Actually you can't select CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPATH on mainline because
> powerpc doesn't enable P
Can you fix your patch sending technique ? A mangled patch inline with a
non-mangled one in attachment... that's a bit gross. Just get a proper
one inline and be done with it. If your mailer can't be coerced into not
damaging patches, then use another one for sending them.
Cheers,
Ben
_
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 16:34 -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:37 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > > +int ipath_unordered_wc(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return 1;
> > > +}
> >
> > How is the above providin
> +#if defined(__powerpc__)
> + /* There isn't a generic way to specify writethrough mappings */
> + pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) |= _PAGE_NO_CACHE;
> + pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) |= _PAGE_WRITETHRU;
> + pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) &= ~_PAGE_GUARDED;
> +#endif
I don't see an
