Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (manykernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-25 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 25.01.2006 [08:17:29 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results > > (manykernels, many svn trees) > > > > On 24.01.2006 [23:19:52 +0200], Michael

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (manykernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 25.01.2006 [08:17:29 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results > > (manykernels, many svn trees) > > > > On 24.01.2006 [23:19:52 +0200], Michael

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (manykernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [23:19:52 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results > > (manykernels, many svn trees) > > > > On 24.01.2006 [21:39:23 +0200], Michael

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (manykernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [23:19:52 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results > > (manykernels, many svn trees) > > > > On 24.01.2006 [21:39:23 +0200], Michael

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (manykernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [21:39:23 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results > > (manykernels, many svn trees) > > > > Michael> 1 sec = 5.37731e+14 usec > > > > Michael> which seems to indica

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [20:54:38 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many > > kernels,many svn trees) > > > > On 24.01.2006 [01:44:42 +0200], Michael

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (manykernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [11:24:02 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > Michael> Thats what trunk head does, but Nishanth Aravamudan here > Michael> sees > > Michael> 1 sec = 5.37731e+14 usec > > Michael> which seems to indicate something's still wrong. &g

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [01:44:42 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I have just uploaded a simple utility which I called clock_test which > > > measures a clock once a second: this way you'll know whether mtfb

[openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [01:39:07 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees) > > > > On 23.01.2006 [23:22:45 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >

Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.01.2006 [01:01:32 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Looks like 5162/5163 is fine building wise. Here is what I got for > > rdma_lat for a 32-bit server and 32-bit client: > > > > loading libehca loc

[openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [23:22:45 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees) > > > > On 23.01.2006 [10:24:12 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > >

[openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [23:22:45 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees) > > > > On 23.01.2006 [10:24:12 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > >

[openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [10:24:12 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting r. Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,?many svn trees) > > > > >

[openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,?many svn trees) > > > > > > >If true, it seems that this line > > >typedef unsigned long long cycles_t; > > >should be replaced by >

[openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [18:53:58 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees) > > > > On 23.01.2006 [18:46:42 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >

[openib-general] Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [18:53:19 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The machines are running ppc64 kernels. > > BTW, does this configuration (ppc32 on ppc64) support the mftb instruction? Good question :) How would I go about ch

Re: [openib-general] Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [18:46:42 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Bah, I just noticed that perftests doesn't even build right now (svn > > 5130). > > Fixed, thanks. Great! What svn revision is it fixed in? 5159 is

[openib-general] Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.01.2006 [15:19:59 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees) > > > > On 09.01.2006 [08:33:01 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Qu

Re: [openib-general] Re: patch to ulp/iser such that it would work withlatest open-iscsi

2006-01-21 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 20.01.2006 [18:08:09 +0200], Or Gerlitz wrote: > The patch was not applied to the svn, so no need to redo Ok, for now, just so I can get numbers, I'm going to have to disable ISER. If you have a patch you'd like me to test (against 2.6.16-rc1-git3 as of right now), just send it my way. Thanks,

[openib-general] Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-20 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 09.01.2006 [08:33:01 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Just like with the results I posted earlier, all the perftest results > > are seriously wrong for 32-bit clients (with both 32-bit and 64-bit > > servers)

[openib-general] Re: patch to ulp/iser such that it would work with latest open-iscsi

2006-01-19 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 19.01.2006 [16:18:47 +0200], Or Gerlitz wrote: > Nish, > > For now, please use this patch for your compilation against latest > kernels containing latest (post official 2.6.15) open-iscsi Could you redo this patch so it applies to the kernel tree? Thanks, Nish

[openib-general] Re: patch to ulp/iser such that it would work with latest open-iscsi

2006-01-19 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 19.01.2006 [16:18:47 +0200], Or Gerlitz wrote: > Nish, > > For now, please use this patch for your compilation against latest kernels > containing latest (post official 2.6.15) open-iscsi That's what I get for responding to e-mails before scanning my whole inbox :) I will try this patch out a

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2006-01-19 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 19.01.2006 [07:35:04 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 00:25, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Trying to run the compilation tests against 2.6.16-rc1-git1 and am > > getting this: > > > > CC [M] drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.o > &

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2006-01-18 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 30.12.2005 [07:26:34 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Nish, > > On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 00:04, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 29.12.2005 [23:29:10 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > Hi Nish, > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 20

Re: [openib-general] kernel build failure

2006-01-15 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 15.01.2006 [12:24:59 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 11:48, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > > > IPOIB is failing to build with 2.6.15 and svn 4981 and 5009 > > > > In file included from drivers/infiniband/core/at.c:55:

[openib-general] Re: kernel build failure

2006-01-15 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 15.01.2006 [16:09:45 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 15.01.2006 [08:56:48 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > > Nishanth> Is this related the semaphore to mutex conversions from > > Nishanth> Ingo? If so, does this mean that it's only expected to > >

[openib-general] Re: kernel build failure

2006-01-15 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 15.01.2006 [08:56:48 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > Nishanth> Is this related the semaphore to mutex conversions from > Nishanth> Ingo? If so, does this mean that it's only expected to > Nishanth> build with 2.6.15-git{6,7,...} or so? (Remember, I'm > Nishanth> stuck with 2.6.15

[openib-general] kernel build failure

2006-01-15 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi Roland, IPOIB is failing to build with 2.6.15 and svn 4981 and 5009 In file included from drivers/infiniband/core/at.c:55: drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h:52:34: linux/mutex-backport.h: No such file or directory In file included from drivers/infiniband/core/at.c:55: drivers/infiniband/ul

[openib-general] Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-08 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 09.01.2006 [08:33:01 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Just like with the results I posted earlier, all the perftest results > > are seriously wrong for 32-bit clients (with both 32-bit and 64-bit > > servers)

[openib-general] Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

2006-01-08 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hello all, Here are more results, where each section's heading indicates server-client size (e.g. 32-65 is a 32-bit server and a 64-bit client), only related to userspace; that is both machines are running (identical) 64-bit kernels. Each row is headed by the particular kernel which was booted on t

Re: [openib-general] Re: ppc64 build failure (4778)

2006-01-05 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 05.01.2006 [15:15:10 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > Ugh, the latest git tree still has version 2.6.15, so there's no way > to tell if add_hotplug_env_var() has changed or not. This will fix > itself once 2.6.16-rc1 comes out in about 10 days, but I don't know of > a good way to fix it until the

[openib-general] Re: ppc64 build failure (4778)

2006-01-05 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 05.01.2006 [13:08:39 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > Sorry, my previous "fix" was totally bogus. I checked something in > that should compile OK against both 2.6.15 and mainline. with 4785, I still get: drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c: In function `ib_device_uevent': drivers/infiniband/core/sy

[openib-general] Re: ppc64 build failure (4778)

2006-01-05 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 05.01.2006 [13:08:39 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > Sorry, my previous "fix" was totally bogus. I checked something in > that should compile OK against both 2.6.15 and mainline. I assume that was what caused this: drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c:653: error: unknown field `hotplug' specified

[openib-general] Re: ppc64 build failure (4778)

2006-01-05 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 05.01.2006 [11:44:47 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > Nishanth> Hi all, New build failure today: > > Nishanth> drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c: In function > Nishanth> `ib_device_hotplug': > Nishanth> drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c:440: warning: implicit > Nishanth> declarati

[openib-general] ppc64 build failure (4778)

2006-01-05 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi all, New build failure today: drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c: In function `ib_device_hotplug': drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c:440: warning: implicit declaration of function `add_hotplug_env_var' drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c: At top level: drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c:653: error: unkno

[openib-general] Re: Userspace testing results (2.6.15-rc7-git2 with modules)

2006-01-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 01.01.2006 [12:02:42 -0800], Roland Dreier wrote: > Nish, I haven't had time to look at the issues you saw yet, but let me > say right off the bat that you're awesome ;) Heh, I'm glad I was actually able to get some runs in before New Year's. I actually have results for svn rev 4662 and 4663 (4

Re: [openib-general] Userspace testing results (2.6.15-rc7-git2 with modules)

2006-01-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 31.12.2005 [20:40:00 -0600], Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > Currently, I am running netpipe, iperf and netperf (these three tests > > are giving horrible results but we are pretty sure that it is a local > > issue, as both eth1 and ib0 based tests lead to poor performance) and > > also netpipe with

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2005-12-30 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 30.12.2005 [12:30:18 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi again Nish, > > On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 12:23, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > [snip...] > > > > > I am attaching the patch for this. Note that this patch is for > > > > 2.6.15-rc and not 2

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2005-12-30 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 30.12.2005 [12:30:18 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi again Nish, > > On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 12:23, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > [snip...] > > > > > I am attaching the patch for this. Note that this patch is for > > > > 2.6.15-rc and not 2

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2005-12-30 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 30.12.2005 [08:13:26 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 30.12.2005 [07:26:34 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Hi Nish, > > > > On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 00:04, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 29.12.2005 [23:29:10 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2005-12-30 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 30.12.2005 [07:26:34 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Nish, > > On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 00:04, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 29.12.2005 [23:29:10 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > Hi Nish, > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 20

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2005-12-29 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 29.12.2005 [23:29:10 -0500], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Nish, > > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 20:31, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Building 2.6.15-rc7-git3 on ppc64 with svn=4654 kernel components leads > > to: > > > > drivers/

Re: [openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2005-12-29 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 29.12.2005 [17:31:28 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Hi, > > Building 2.6.15-rc7-git3 on ppc64 with svn=4654 kernel components leads > to: > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c: In function > `iscsi_iser_conn_set_param': > drivers/infiniband/ulp/

[openib-general] ISER fails to build on 2.6.15-rc7-git3 (svn=4654)

2005-12-29 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi, Building 2.6.15-rc7-git3 on ppc64 with svn=4654 kernel components leads to: drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c: In function `iscsi_iser_conn_set_param': drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c:1436: error: `ISCSI_PARAM_RDMAEXTENSIONS' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/i

[openib-general] Userspace testing results (2.6.15-rc7-git2 with modules)

2005-12-29 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hello all, After quite a bit of struggling, I have added automated userspace testing, as described below, to my daily kernel builds. Effectively, with the combinations of kernel.org -git trees and svn kernel code and modular or built-in CONFIG_ settings, I have added the combinations of 64-bit an

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] add LDFLAGS to perftest/Makefile

2005-12-15 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 15.12.2005 [09:35:12 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] add LDFLAGS to perftest/Makefile > > > > On 15.12.2005 [08:57:24 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Quoting N

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] add LDFLAGS to perftest/Makefile

2005-12-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 15.12.2005 [08:57:24 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Is there a reason the perftest/Makefile doesn't use LDFLAGS? > > Specifically, in automating userspace build & test, I put the IB > > libraries in

Re: [openib-general] Compilation failure in perftest/rdma_lat (latest svn)

2005-12-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.12.2005 [18:29:04 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Hi, > > ppc32 version of perftest is failing with: > > gcc -m32 -m32 -I/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/out/ppc32/include -Wall -O2 -g > -D_GNU_SOURCE rdma_lat.c get_clock.c -libverbs -o rdma_lat > /usr/lo

[openib-general] Compilation failure in perftest/rdma_lat (latest svn)

2005-12-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi, ppc32 version of perftest is failing with: gcc -m32 -m32 -I/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/out/ppc32/include -Wall -O2 -g -D_GNU_SOURCE rdma_lat.c get_clock.c -libverbs -o rdma_lat /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp//ccJld3yB.o(.text+0x6c8): In function `main': /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/gen2-

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] add LDFLAGS to perftest/Makefile

2005-12-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.12.2005 [15:23:08 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 14.12.2005 [09:14:52 -0800], Grant Grundler wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:57:26AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Author: sagir > > > Date: 2005-12-14 01:57:24 -0800 (Wed, 14 Dec 200

[openib-general] [PATCH] add LDFLAGS to perftest/Makefile

2005-12-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
escription: Add LDFLAGS to the perftest Makefile to allow library directories in non-standard locations to be specified. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Makefile2005-12-14 14:57:04.0 -0800 +++ Makefile.ldflags2005-12-14 14:57:23.0 -0800 @@ -2

Re: [openib-general] Infiniband compilation testing

2005-11-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.11.2005 [19:03:20 +0200], Dan Bar Dov wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > I committed fixes to the ppc64 compile warnings in iser: > Committed revision 4044. Great, thanks! -Nish ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/m

Re: [openib-general] Infiniband compilation testing

2005-11-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.11.2005 [19:03:20 +0200], Dan Bar Dov wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > I committed fixes to the ppc64 compile warnings in iser: > Committed revision 4044. Just wanted to confirm that 4044 compiles w/o infiniband warnings now. Thanks again, Nish ___ open

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.14 Compile Error

2005-11-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.11.2005 [15:35:59 -0700], Alfred Torrez wrote: > I am seeing the following errors using svn ver 4044 and 2.6.14 kernel. > Have I missed a patch? Which gcc and which arch? Can you try against 2.6.15-rc1 (my latest compilations for x86, x86_64 and ppc64 all built fine with latest svn versus la

[openib-general] Infiniband compilation testing

2005-11-13 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi all, Latest results (now on three archs: x86, ppc64, x86_64): kernel.org: =y x86 --> OK ppc64 --> OK x86_64 --> OK =m x86 --> OK ppc64 --> OK x86_64 --> OK svn: =y

Re: [openib-general] ppc64 compilation failure

2005-10-31 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 31.10.2005 [10:49:24 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Hi Roland, > > Looks like ppc64 build with 2.6.14-git3 and svn 3918 is busted: Only the ppc64 build had finished when I sent this mail, but the same happens on x86, with an additional: drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser

[openib-general] ppc64 compilation failure

2005-10-31 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi Roland, Looks like ppc64 build with 2.6.14-git3 and svn 3918 is busted: drivers/infiniband/core/uat.c: In function `ib_uat_init': drivers/infiniband/core/uat.c:837: warning: passing arg 2 of `class_device_create' makes pointer from integer without a cast drivers/infiniband/core/uat.c:837: war

[openib-general] Re: Automated userspace build error

2005-10-27 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 27.10.2005 [14:31:31 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: Automated userspace build error > > > > On 25.10.2005 [15:22:56 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > > > Nishanth> Hrm, well, I&#

Re: [openib-general] Automated userspace build error

2005-10-27 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 26.10.2005 [17:15:05 -0700], Woodruff, Robert J wrote: > Nish wrote, > >On a related note, do you (or anyone else) have any suggestions for > >build-testing all of the userspace components? There isn't a top-level > >Makefile of any kind to make it easy :/ > > >Thanks, > >Nish > > If you look

Re: [openib-general] Automated userspace build error

2005-10-26 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 25.10.2005 [15:22:56 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > Nishanth> Hrm, well, I'm testing the latest svn (3865), did the > Nishanth> patch just get checked in? > > Yeah, I only noticed it and fixed it after your original email. I > just meant that I had already checked it in before sending

Re: [openib-general] Automated userspace build error

2005-10-25 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 25.10.2005 [15:09:42 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > >checking dynamic linker charactericonfigure: error: > >ibv_get_devices() not found. libibcm requires libibcm. > > The last error seeming like a circular dependency is just a typo, > fixed by the following patch (already checked in)

[openib-general] Automated userspace build error

2005-10-25 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi all, I'm trying to add at least the build portion of userspace testing to my daily kernel build tests, but am running into the following failure in libibcm: checking dynamic linker charactericonfigure: error: ibv_get_devices() not found. libibcm requires libibcm. Not sure, wh

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH/RFC] mthca: report catastrophic errors

2005-10-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.10.2005 [15:33:57 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > Nishanth> I know akpm has been harping on this only recently (I > Nishanth> have yet to audit all the kernel, but will get around to > Nishanth> it eventually), but these three inits can be done via > Nishanth> setup_timer() now

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH/RFC] mthca: report catastrophic errors

2005-10-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.10.2005 [13:54:25 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > I just committed the following patch, which adds some initial support > for detecting and reporting catastrophic errors reported by Mellanox > HCAs. We start a periodic timer which polls the catastrophic error > reporting buffer in device memo

Re: [openib-general] moving IBM eHCA Device Driver to openib.org

2005-10-19 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 19.10.2005 [10:32:42 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > IBMEHCA> I put out a initial set of files (as discussed) on > IBMEHCA> openib.org svn. The Kconfig option will follow when I've > IBMEHCA> verified that it really compiles as is in svn. > > Great, it's good to have the code in svn

Re: [openib-general] initialization -udev

2005-10-17 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 17.10.2005 [17:16:13 -0400], Suresh Shelvapille wrote: > 1. I did not add the CONFIG_INFINIBAND=y by hand. I used make menuconfig and > the GUI let me choose "y" to select the Infiniband core. And the result was, > in .config which I presume is the one generated by the GUI has > CONIFG_INFINIBAN

Re: [PATCH] core/addr: fix compilation warning {was Re:[openib-general] Latest build test results}

2005-10-17 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 17.10.2005 [10:54:21 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > Sean> Does anyone know the reason for this change? > > From the git tree, I can tell you that the change is from the commit: > > diff-tree f2ccd8fa06c8e302116e71df372f5c1f83432e03 (from > b6b99eb5409d75ae35390057cd28f3aedfbd4cf4) >

[PATCH] core/addr: fix compilation warning {was Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results}

2005-10-15 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 15.10.2005 [06:05:54 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Nish, > > On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 01:24, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 11.10.2005 [23:15:27 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > Hi again Nish, > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 21:39, Nisha

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 11.10.2005 [23:15:27 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi again Nish, > > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 21:39, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > > Update arp_recv functions to latest 2.6.14 netdevice.h API for struct > > > > > packet_type > > > > >

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-11 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 11.10.2005 [23:15:27 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi again Nish, > > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 21:39, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > > Update arp_recv functions to latest 2.6.14 netdevice.h API for struct > > > > > packet_type > > > > >

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-11 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 11.10.2005 [21:27:15 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Nish, > > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:45, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 07.10.2005 [09:48:56 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 15:26, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2005

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-11 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 07.10.2005 [09:48:56 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 15:26, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 15:20, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 06.10.2005 [13:25:35 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 13

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-07 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 07.10.2005 [09:48:56 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 15:26, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 15:20, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 06.10.2005 [13:25:35 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 13

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-07 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 07.10.2005 [08:21:19 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 14:11, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 06.10.2005 [13:25:35 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 13:11, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > On 06.10.2005 [19:4

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-06 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 06.10.2005 [13:25:35 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 13:11, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 06.10.2005 [19:40:40 +0300], Dan Bar Dov wrote: > > > I've fixed the 2.6.14-rc3 compilation warnings with iSER on x86 in > > > version 3682. >

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-06 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 06.10.2005 [13:25:35 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 13:11, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 06.10.2005 [19:40:40 +0300], Dan Bar Dov wrote: > > > I've fixed the 2.6.14-rc3 compilation warnings with iSER on x86 in > > > version 3682. >

Re: [openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-06 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 06.10.2005 [19:40:40 +0300], Dan Bar Dov wrote: > I've fixed the 2.6.14-rc3 compilation warnings with iSER on x86 in version > 3682. Great! Thanks. I'm re-running the tests (due to a subtle flaw in my PATH, my cronjobs weren't running) now and will post the latest results. Thanks, Nish _

[openib-general] Latest build test results

2005-10-03 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hello, Here are the build results for 2.6.14-rc3 with and without the latest gen2 trunk. Looks like all the builds were successful, with some warnings: - ppc64 + gen2 with =y drivers/infiniband/core/at.c:1547: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type drivers/infiniband/ulp/sdp/s

Re: [openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-28 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 28.09.2005 [14:02:09 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 03:46, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On PPC64, there was also the following warning in SDP: > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/sdp/sdp_link.c:752: warning: initialization from > incompatible pointer type

Re: [openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-28 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.09.2005 [11:11:08 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 24.09.2005 [10:19:53 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > > Nish> I have a prototype of something similar running right now, > > Nish> to help test InfiniBand, both in mainline and in the svn > > N

Re: [openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-26 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 26.09.2005 [10:15:21 -0700], Grant Grundler wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:19:53AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > ... > > I just checked in a fix for this -- the pci_pretty_name() API has gone > > away, so I removed our use of it in svn. I don't understand how your > > other builds of git +

Re: [openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-26 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 26.09.2005 [10:15:21 -0700], Grant Grundler wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:19:53AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > ... > > I just checked in a fix for this -- the pci_pretty_name() API has gone > > away, so I removed our use of it in svn. I don't understand how your > > other builds of git +

Re: [openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-25 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.09.2005 [11:11:08 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 24.09.2005 [10:19:53 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > > Nish> I have a prototype of something similar running right now, > > Nish> to help test InfiniBand, both in mainline and in the svn > > N

Re: [openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.09.2005 [10:19:53 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > Nish> I have a prototype of something similar running right now, > Nish> to help test InfiniBand, both in mainline and in the svn > Nish> repo. Basically, every night (this part hasn't been set up > Nish> yet, but should be noth

Re: [openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 24.09.2005 [10:19:53 -0700], Roland Dreier wrote: > Nish> I have a prototype of something similar running right now, > Nish> to help test InfiniBand, both in mainline and in the svn > Nish> repo. Basically, every night (this part hasn't been set up > Nish> yet, but should be noth

[openib-general] InfiniBand compilation testing

2005-09-24 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Roland, OpenIB developers, As many people who follow LKML may have seen, Martin Bligh recently set up test.kernel.org to host automated machine testing results. I have a prototype of something similar running right now, to help test InfiniBand, both in mainline and in the svn repo. Basically, ev

Re: [openib-general] DHCP over infiniband

2005-09-23 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 23.09.2005 [11:25:02 -0600], cynthia segura wrote: > I'm new to infiniband and I'm trying to assign an IP address to an > infiniband interface using DHCP. Currently, I have a small test cluster > (two nodes only) each with an infiniband HCA cabled back to back (no > switch). I am running a

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH][iWARP] IW CM Verbs

2005-08-26 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 26.08.2005 [14:44:25 -0400], Tom Tucker wrote: > > This is a cleaned up version of the iWARP CM verbs based > on feedback from Roland and Sean. I've added a new file to > contain the iw specific types and changed the iw specific > type prefix to iw_. > > Please comment, and if it looks good,

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL dapl_os_wait_object_wait()

2005-08-02 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 25.07.2005 [15:20:29 -0700], Arlin Davis wrote: > James, > > Here is a patch to fix dapl_os_wait_object_wait() returning > EINVAL when passing nsec == 10 to pthread_cond_timedwait(). > Hit a rare case where _microsecs was exactly 100. Hrm, rather than use all of these hard-coded

Re: [openib-general] wiki down

2005-07-18 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 18.07.2005 [10:19:17 +0300], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I get timeouts on http://openib.org/tiki Seems to work ok for me, right now... Thanks, Nish ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-g

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/27] Add MAD helper functions

2005-07-11 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 11.07.2005 [11:30:23 -0400], Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 10:39, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Monday 11 July 2005 17:48, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > Add new helper routines for allocating MADs for sending and formatting > > > a send WR. > > > > > -- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1/driver

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] sdp_inet: fix schedule_timeout() usage

2005-06-29 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 30.06.2005 [00:24:10 +0300], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > @@ -710,11 +711,12 @@ > > > > if (!accept_conn) { > > > > DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); &

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] sdp_inet: fix schedule_timeout() usage

2005-06-29 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 29.06.2005 [21:22:18 +0300], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Libor Michalek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdp_inet: fix schedule_timeout() usage > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:48:55PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > &g

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] sdp_inet: fix schedule_timeout() usage

2005-06-29 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 29.06.2005 [11:14:40 -0700], Libor Michalek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:48:55PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > Using schedule_timeout() without setting the state first is broken and > > causes schedule_timeout() to return immediately (effectively

[openib-general] [PATCH] sdp_inet: fix schedule_timeout() usage

2005-06-28 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
state and are thus going to run again). In each of these loops in sdp_inet.c involving schedule_timeout(), the first iteration is correct, but subsequent ones result in busy-wait. Add the appropriate set_current_state() call to fix the issue. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [openib-general] Re: [KJ] [RFC] TODO file cleanups

2005-01-18 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:19:40AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Matthew> Funny you should mention that. > > Matthew> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c: yield(); > Matthew> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c: yield(); > > Matthew> *SLAP*. > > ouch ;) > > What should t