Supporting IPOIB fail over with the Bonding driver will work - we
currently use this for GE, etc.
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 14:27 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Richard Frank wrote:
Does IPOIB in this stack support transparent fail over between ports and
across redundant HCAs using a virtual IP
Does IPOIB in this stack support transparent fail over between ports and
across redundant HCAs using a virtual IP ?
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please
Currently, all I have is problem to resolve. We will think about a
general model..
For Oracle to support running RAC on a single fabric - assuming the
fabric is utilized for both network (inter node cluster com) plus
storage I/O - we need to limit /control latencies of cluster network
msgs such
Some application level protocols - require higher QoS levels than others
- for various communication and I/O operations.
For example, cluster inter-node health msgs have fixed latency
requirements that if exceeded may result in unexpected node removals
from the cluster.
Are there any
This discussion assumes a single fabric (e.g IB, or iWARP, etc) for
network and file I/O between a set of nodes sharing storage.
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 12:38 -0400, Richard Frank wrote:
Some application level protocols - require higher QoS levels than others
- for various communication and I/O
Is there a common set available over iWARP / IB ?
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Besides OpenIB for Linux and Windows ?
Solaris ?
AIX ?
HP-UX ?
Are there any plans for interoperability tests / have any completed ?
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To
as a replacement for IT-API / uDAPL /
and standard UDP.
Again any platform with support for RDS will have a significant
performance advantage.
We will fall back to running with UDP on HPUX.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 12:27 -0800, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:59:43PM -0500, Richard Frank wrote
We need both - each for different Oracle clients / functionality with
respective connection models / modes of operation (stream vs datagram).
BTW - Oracle currently uses TCP streams / SDP for Client / middle tier
connectivity to the database. We use UDP / RDS within the database for
inter
We also use TCP streams for disaster recovery archiving involving very
large amounts of data. We would like to move this to SDP via AIO too.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 20:07 -0500, Richard Frank wrote:
We need both - each for different Oracle clients / functionality with
respective connection
We do not see any deficiencies - the RDS specification and current
implementation so far meet our requirements and is working very well.
There is more we will want to do further down the road - such as access
the RDS sockets via AIO so we can add zero copy support.
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at
Title: Message
Oracle currently depends on 64 bytes of private
data for connect and accept.
- Original Message -
From:
Kanevsky,
Arkady
To: Davis, Arlin R ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; Grant Grundler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; openib-general@openib.org
Sent: Wednesday,
12 matches
Mail list logo
