Yes, this is the case.
- Original Message -
From: "Caitlin Bestler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [openib-general] [ANNOUNCE] Contribute RDS
(ReliableDatagramSockets) to OpenIB
Mike Krause wrote in response to Greg Lindahl:
If
Yes, the application is responsible for detecting
lost msgs at the application level - the transport can not do this.
RDS does not guarantee that a message has been
delivered to the application - just that once the transport has accepted a
msg it will deliver the msg to the remote node in o
-
From: "Bob Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Ranjit Pandit'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rick Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: RE: [openib-general] [ANNOUNCE] Contribute
RDS(ReliableDat
SCTP is connection based - we have many dependencies on our connectionless
datagram model.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Rimmer, Todd'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Caitlin Bestler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
No we do not use TCP sockets - we use to many connections for this 100k+.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Rick Frank'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ranjit Pandit"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Grant Grun
RDS is UDP protocol with reliability added - it remains connectionless from
the consumer perspective.
SDP is connection based - at least currently.
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Hefty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Grant Grundler" <[EMAIL PROTECT
It is very important to Oracle for RDS to be available in OpenIB in as many
Linux distributions as possible.
Is this going to happen and in what timeframe / what are the plans for Linux
distributions to pick up OpenIB with RDS support ?
How can we (Oracle) help ?
- Original Message -
It is very important to Oracle for RDS to be available in OpenIB in as many
Linux distributions as possible.
Is this going to happen and in what timeframe / what are the plans for Linux
distributions to pick up OpenIB with RDS support ?
How can we (Oracle) help ?
- Original Message
One key
argument I've heard in favor of iSER vs SRP is that iSCSI (top level iSER
driver) has a very strong management infrastructure - as it is fairly
mature.However, iSER seems to be just gaining steam in terms of
direct attached storage supporting this protocol .vs. SRP.Would it
not be p
