, version 1.1
www.infinibandta.org
[IPoIB_ARCH] draft-ietf-ipoib-architecture-04.txt, V. Kashyap
[IPoIB_UD] draft-ietf-ipoib-ip-over-infiniband-9.txt,
H.K. Jerry Chu, V. Kashyap
Author's Address
Vivek Kashyap
continue to cc
this list) to involve all since there have been suggestions for draft update.
Vivek
__
Vivek Kashyap
Linux Technology Center, IBM
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Roland Dreier wrote:
Vivek I should say it depends. One can utilise a setup that sets
Vivek the MTU to 2044 or whatever is the UD MTU on the subnet for
Vivek all modes. The connection will advertise the maximum
Vivek receive MTU as this value.
OK, but
On 19 May 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi Vivek,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 12:41, Vivek Kashyap wrote:
snip...
The most interesting optimization available is implementing the IPoIB
connected mode draft, although I don't think it's as easy as Vivek
indicated -- for example, I'm
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Roland Dreier wrote:
Vivek The draft does allow for a negotiation per connection for
Vivek the implementations that wish to take advantage of
Vivek it. However, an implementation can by default choose to use
Vivek a 'connected-mode MTU' e.g. 32K always. It
snip...
The most interesting optimization available is implementing the IPoIB
connected mode draft, although I don't think it's as easy as Vivek
indicated -- for example, I'm not sure how to deal with having
different MTUs depending on the destination.
snip...
The draft does allow for a
I suggest that the implementation discussion not be reflected on ipoverib.
I've bcc'd to ipoverib for this mail. Those interested in the details can
follow it on netdev/openib.
Thanks,
Vivek
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Krishna Kumar wrote:
Hi Roland,
Couple of minor comments on
