I've got the whole kernel 2.6.19-rc5 with infiniband.
But there is no sdp module there. Can OFED1.x run
under FC5?
zhu
--- Or Gerlitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
how can I git latest tree?
git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
how can I git latest tree?
git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
Or.
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all
openib src: svn the latest from openfabrics
kernel : 2.6.18 FC5
error: ipoib_multicast.c: in struct net_device there
is no xmit_lock member name
how to handle it?
tks
zhu
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo!
You mean - when only a single socket is open?
Every one connection will cost 2M RAM. So I make the
following changes:
#define SDP_TX_SIZE 0x4
#define SDP_RX_SIZE 0x4
The SDP protocol uses ARP over IPoIB for its address
resolution.
So you'd need to find some other way to perform
address
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: why sdp connections cost so much
memory
You mean - when only a single socket is open?
Every one connection will cost 2M RAM. So I make
the
following changes:
#define
You should not need this change with the scale patch
I posted - after applying
this, and setting the scale parameter to 0x1, each
connection should use around
128K for RX. Please confirm.
I have tested it again, yes, you are right. I just set
the scale parameter to 0x1, each connection cost
You should not need this change with the scale patch
I posted - after applying
this, and setting the scale parameter to 0x1, each
connection should use around
128K for RX. Please confirm.
Just setting the scale parameter to 0x1, memory
reduction is OK. But there occurred one bug,
sometimes
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: why sdp connections cost so much
memory
You should not need this change with the scale
patch
I posted - after applying
this, and setting the scale parameter to 0x1,
each
to use
ib_query_gid correctly?
If I want to let SDP module is independent of ipoib
module, it it difficult?
tks
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: why sdp connections cost so much
memory
OFED-1.1-rc3 has passed
OFED-1.1-rc3 has passed my tests. I have to adjust
Post buffer size to 0x4 and use your patch for me.
Can you make it fixed not to do these myself manually?
zhu
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Have you resolved the problem?
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have reproduced the connection refusal
problem and I am looking into it.
Thanks!
MST
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: why sdp connections cost so much memory
I haven't
If it's spec bug is it difficult to solve? And how
long will it take you to complete the bugfix? I
really hope SDP can work as stably as TCP.
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did - this is the spec bug we are discussing with
Sean.
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL
Although SDP is not working correctly now, it can
easily support many existing applications based on
Sockets API. Patrick say rdma is a connected model
and has serious scalability problem. But Does
send/recv model has or support SDP-alike API?
zhu
Do you have any progress?
zhu
--- Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
I have changed SDP_RX_SIZE from 0x40 to 1 and
rebuilt
ib_sdp.ko. But kernel always crashed.
zhu
Hi Zhu,
Can you send us instructions of the test/application
you are running so
we
Do you find the same problem?
zhu
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
{child_rip+0}
Code:8b 40 04 41 39 c6 89 44 24 0c 7d 3b 45 31 ff 45
31 ed 4c 89
RIP:a0208437{:ib_sdp:sdp_recv_completion+127}RSP010036385dc8
CR2:0004
0kernel panic-not syncing:Oops
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL
I have changed SDP_RX_SIZE from 0x40 to 1 and rebuilt
ib_sdp.ko. But kernel always crashed.
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: why sdp connections cost so much memory
(1) ibv_devinfo
HCA: MHES18-XTC
FW: 1.1.0
(1) ibv_devinfo
HCA: MHES18-XTC
FW: 1.1.0
OFED: OFED-1.1-rc1
(2) Test Bed
On Client:
ib0: 193.12.10.24
test command:
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/local/ofed/lib64/libsdp.so
SIMPLE_LIBSDP=1 ab -c m -n m -X 193.12.10.14:3129
http://www.sse.com.cn/sseportal/ps/zhs/home.shtml
The web page is about 68K.
On Server:
Dear Sir,
Can I test the new release fixed for large SDP
connections?
tks
zhu
--- Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
Dear Sir,
what's your progress on sdp connection? I'm
waiting
for the new release to test.
tks
zhu
Progress is very good
tks
zhu
--- Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
Dear Sir,
what's your progress on sdp connection? I'm
waiting
for the new release to test.
tks
zhu
Progress is very good, and we succeeded to run
Polygraph with 800
connections for few days
Dear Sir,
what's your progress on sdp connection? I'm waiting
for the new release to test.
tks
zhu
--- Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
I'm sorry SDP is not in production state. SDP is
very
important for our application and we are waiting
it
mature
PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
I'm sorry SDP is not in production state. SDP is
very
important for our application and we are waiting
it
mature enough to be used in our product. And do
you
have any schedule to let SDP work ok(especially
can
support many large concurrent
Notes:
1. SDP and RDS are in technology preview state.
2. The SRP Initiator and Open MPI are in beta state.
3. All other OFED components are in production
state.
I'm sorry SDP is not in production state. SDP is very
important for our application and we are waiting it
mature enough
It's hard to download OFED-rc6 release through svn. Do
you suggest some more direct way to get them?
tks
zhu
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
MST,
how about sdp progress now?
zhu
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
openib-general mailing list
I won't wait sdp OK. I hope to use another method to
port squid. I know VAPI, uDAP can do this. But can
you suggest me which is best way I should adopt? And
How can I get more info about how to program using
these methods?
tks
zhu
__
gen2 svn is compatible with ttcp.aio.c. there is no
where to define SOL_SDP constant.
zhu
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
i'll test latest svn with FC5-x86_64. Will you fix
the problem in OFED release or svn version?
tks
zhu
--- Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhu shi song wrote:
Do you have any time table for sdp? My project is
urgent to use sdp. If it's too late, I'll think
another method
Engineering Director, Software Architect
Mellanox Technologies LTD
Tel:+972-4-9097208
Fax:+972-4-9593245
P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:openib-general-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of zhu shi song
Sent: Wednesday, May 17
computing customized applications. But unfortunately
it can't work. I hope you can speed your development
process. I'll try my best to help you. I'm studying
the source code now.
tks
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I hope
Also I found sdp has memory leak problem. After
Client connect Server for several thousands times,
just 2.5% of system memory is free. SDP exhausted the
whole memory at all.
tks
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I hope
I have installed OFED RC4 on my RHEL 4.3(2.6.9-34
kernel). I use the same method I told in previous
mail. When increasing concurrent sdp connection to
2000. sdp refuse connection in server side. And client
can't connect to server through sdp connection
forever.
OS: RHEL 4.3 (2.6.9-34)
IB: OFED
why don't use db4-devel. db-devel sems obsolete.
zhu
--- Vladimir Sokolovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) wrote:
db-devel package is required to build open_iscsi
package RPM.
This package is not relevant for RHEL 4.3.
There are two options to install
shi song
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:17 PM
To: openib-general@openib.org
Subject: [openib-general] OFED RC4 also can't
support 2000
connections
I have installed OFED RC4 on my RHEL 4.3(2.6.9-34
kernel). I use the same method I told in previous
mail. When increasing concurrent
)
./ttcp.aio -t 193.12.10.14 (on Client)
(2) I can't ping another machine through ib. After I
run opensm once, I can. I stop it for a while , I
can't.
How can I set the IB for its work correctly?
tks
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL
I upgrage IBG2-2.0.1 install using
openib-usermode-6829-1.x86_64.rpm. Which is newer
version?
Under 6829-1 version, libsdp.so can't work but
AF_INET_SDP program is ok. See below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# LD_PRELOAD=libsdp.so ab -c 1 -n 1
-X 193.12.10.14:3129 http://www.google.com/index.html
I can't get the latest source from
svn co https://openfabrics.org/svn/gen2; in one whole
day, it's so slow.
Do you think the lastest source solve the problem? Or
can you test sdp for 2000 concurrent connections?
tks
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi
{
:ib_mad:ib_mad_send_done_handler+20} RSP
1003ccadd78
CR2: 0010
0 Kernel Panic - not syncing: OOps
who has tested the stability and performance of sdp
when supporting large mount of concurrent connections?
It seems sdp connection building is very slow.
tks
zhu shi song
{
:ib_mad:ib_mad_send_done_handler+20} RSP
1003ccadd78
CR2: 0010
0 Kernel Panic - not syncing: OOps
who has tested the stability and performance of sdp
when supporting large mount of concurrent connections?
It seems sdp connection building is very slow.
tks
zhu shi song
the two machines to
restore sdp to work.
I think sdp can't support many connections. Who
knows what the problem exactly is ? How to solve the
problem?
tks
zhu shi song
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
ab send the request to squid cache server running on
Machine B. Then squid send the real request to google
website.
So how can I upgrade my version to solve the
problem?
zhu
--- Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting r. zhu shi song [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: sdp can't
I hope to test sdp connection capacity and its
performance. Who has the test tools? Or which tool
is more suitable?
tks
zhu shi song
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
42 matches
Mail list logo
