Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Anyhow, we are within days of starting on this.
There are 2 main portions of this:
1. Port to gen2 API
2. Fix build
The other aspects can wait if necessary.
How long before we need the first part ? Is there any expectation on how
long code review would last ? Or would they a
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 15:59, Tom Duffy wrote:
> Actually, I thought we agreed that this was necessary to have before we
> submit to lkml. At least for inclusion. How is somebody going to test
> the openib code without an SM. (And no, buying a topspin switch is not
> the answer :-P Nor is using
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 15:41 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> One more thing:
> Do we also want to say something about no SM right now ? Or is that
> putting a cosmic kick me sign on ?
Actually, I thought we agreed that this was necessary to have before we
submit to lkml. At least for inclusion. Ho
