Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] Use time_after_eq() instead of time_after() in queue_req()

2006-10-17 Thread Sean Hefty
Acked-by: Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Roland, this looks good for 2.6.20. How would you like to handle pulling in patches like these? Once OFA has git up, would it be easier to pull them into my git tree, then request that you pull from there, or does this work okay? In queue_req(), use

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] Use time_after_eq() instead of time_after() in queue_req()

2006-10-17 Thread Roland Dreier
Roland, this looks good for 2.6.20. How would you like to handle pulling in patches like these? Once OFA has git up, would it be easier to pull them into my git tree, then request that you pull from there, or does this work okay? Git pulls are definitely the easiest, but I'm fine with

[openib-general] [PATCH] Use time_after_eq() instead of time_after() in queue_req()

2006-10-16 Thread Krishna Kumar
In queue_req(), use time_after_eq() instead of time_after() for following reasons : - Improves insert time if multiple entries with same time are present. - set_timeout need not be called if entry with same time is added to the list (and that happens to be the entry with the smallest time),