On 6/3/05, Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>William> Should the device nodes /dev/infiniband_mad and
>William> /dev/infiniband_verbs exist at all? Are they artifacts of
>William> the way the classes work, or a setup problem on my
>William> system? Do other people have these
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:50:02PM -0400, William Jordan wrote:
> On 6/3/05, Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >William> Should the device nodes /dev/infiniband_mad and
> >William> /dev/infiniband_verbs exist at all? Are they artifacts of
> >William> the way the classes work, o
William> Should the device nodes /dev/infiniband_mad and
William> /dev/infiniband_verbs exist at all? Are they artifacts of
William> the way the classes work, or a setup problem on my
William> system? Do other people have these nodes?
I don't get those nodes -- I seem to recall a u
On 6/2/05, Libor Michalek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:43:47PM -0400, William Jordan wrote:
> >
> > The udev support/naming works fine. Regarding naming, the ib_uverbs
> > and ib_umad drivers only put port specific devices in the /dev/infiniband
> > directory. They also c
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:52:47PM -0400, Bill Jordan wrote:
> Libor,
>
> Here is a patch to remove the devfs usage from ib_ucm.
Thanks Bill, applied and commited.
> The udev support already exists, but requires a
> rule entry of KERNEL="ucm", NAME="infiniband/%k".
> Is there an appropriate pl
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:52:47PM -0400, Bill Jordan wrote:
> The udev support already exists, but requires a
> rule entry of KERNEL="ucm", NAME="infiniband/%k".
> Is there an appropriate place that the udev rules
> should be documented?
I checked the openib_faq.txt and it doesn't mention "udev".
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 17:52 -0400, Bill Jordan wrote:
> The udev support already exists, but requires a
> rule entry of KERNEL="ucm", NAME="infiniband/%k".
> Is there an appropriate place that the udev rules
> should be documented?
right now, the udev rules are documented in:
gen2/trunk/src/linux
Libor,
Here is a patch to remove the devfs usage from ib_ucm.
The udev support already exists, but requires a
rule entry of KERNEL="ucm", NAME="infiniband/%k".
Is there an appropriate place that the udev rules
should be documented?
Signed-off-by: Bill Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: ucm.c
===
