Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:33:19AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 09:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Ingo, does the following look good to you? > > > > Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled. > > Hi, > > can you tell us what this f

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

Quoting r. Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled > > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 09:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Ingo, does the following look good to you? > > > > Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h i

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 09:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Ingo, does the following look good to you? > > Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled. Hi, can you tell us what this fixes? Eg is there a specific problem? I mean... we're adding ifdefs so there bett

[openib-general] [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

Ingo, does the following look good to you? Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h index 316e0fb..39d50c4 100644 --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h ++