I tested this and it works for me.
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:51, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi Ralph,
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:47, Ralph Campbell wrote:
I understand. Maybe it should be the first active, if none, then the
first UP, and if none, the first !disabled.
Exactly. I think
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 13:33, Ralph Campbell wrote:
I tested this and it works for me.
Thanks. Applied.
-- Hal
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit
If opensm is started with no arguments, the default algorithm
for finding a port to bind to will skip ports which are present
but the link is DOWN. If there is only one port in the system,
no port is selected and opensm tries the default HCA name mthca0
which, if not present, confuses opensm and
Hi Ralph,
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 13:31, Ralph Campbell wrote:
If opensm is started with no arguments, the default algorithm
for finding a port to bind to will skip ports which are present
but the link is DOWN. If there is only one port in the system,
no port is selected and opensm tries the
I understand. Maybe it should be the first active, if none, then the
first UP, and if none, the first !disabled.
Mostly I was trying to get something that picked ipath0 port 1
when it was the only port in the system even if the link
is down.
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:12 -0500, Hal Rosenstock
Hi Ralph,
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:47, Ralph Campbell wrote:
I understand. Maybe it should be the first active, if none, then the
first UP, and if none, the first !disabled.
Exactly. I think one more loop (first checking physical state for linkup
and then checking for not disabled) will take
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 13:31, Ralph Campbell wrote:
If opensm is started with no arguments, the default algorithm
for finding a port to bind to will skip ports which are present
but the link is DOWN. If there is only one port in the system,
no port is selected and opensm tries the default HCA
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:51, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi Ralph,
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:47, Ralph Campbell wrote:
I understand. Maybe it should be the first active, if none, then the
first UP, and if none, the first !disabled.
Exactly. I think one more loop (first checking physical state
