Tziporet Koren wrote:
>Jack put the bug fix to OFED 1.0.
>
>Tziporet
>
>
Great.
Did the CMA module (SVN 7742) changes also get in? If not, uDAPL is out
of sync with CMA and will not work.
-arlin
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@open
Jack put the bug fix to OFED 1.0.
Tziporet
-Original Message-
From: James Lentini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:12 AM
To: Tziporet Koren
Cc: Jack Morgenstein; openib-general; Arlin Davis
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma provider -
ad
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Arlin Davis wrote:
> James Lentini wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Wednesday 07 June 2006 18:26, James Lentini wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This (bug fix) can still b
James Lentini wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Wednesday 07 June 2006 18:26, James Lentini wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
>>>
>>>
This (bug fix) can still be included in next-week's release, if you
think it is important
vis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 3:25 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: Davis, Arlin R; Lentini, James; openib-general
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma
> provider - add support for IB_CM_REQ_OPTIONS
>
> Scott Weitzen
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) wrote:
Yes, the modules were loaded.
Each of the 32 hosts had 3 IB ports up. Does Intel MPI or uDAPL use
multiple ports and/or multiple HCAs?
I shut down all but one port on each host, and now Pallas is running
better on the 32 nodes using Intel MPI 2.0.1. HP MPI
zenkamp (sweitzen); Arlin Davis
> Cc: Lentini, James; openib-general
> Subject: RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma
> provider - add support for IB_CM_REQ_OPTIONS
>
> Scott,
>
> Can you take a look and see if rdma_cm and rdma_ucm modules are being
> loaded?
>
6 5:08 PM
>To: Arlin Davis; Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
>Cc: Davis, Arlin R; Lentini, James; openib-general
>Subject: RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma provider - add
support for IB_CM_REQ_OPTIONS
>
>
>> this looks like a configuration issue and not the timeout. T
> this looks like a configuration issue and not the timeout. The CR
> timeouts occured with
> the rdma device and not the rdssm. Is IPoIB running on the ib0
> interfaces across the
> fabric?
Yes, IPoIB is running.
Scott
___
openib-general mailing l
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) wrote:
Arlin,
I'm having trouble running Intel MPI 2.0.1 and OFED 1.0 rc5 with Intel
MPI Benchmark 2.3 on a 32-node PCI-X RHEL4 U3 i686 cluster. This thread
caught my eye, can you look at my output and tell me if this is the same
issue? If not, are there other th
James
> Cc: 'openib-general'
> Subject: [openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma provider -
> add support for IB_CM_REQ_OPTIONS
>
> James,
>
> Here is a patch to the openib-cma provider that uses the new
> set_option feature of the uCMA to
> adjust connec
Arlin Davis wrote:
Here is a patch to the openib-cma provider that uses the new set_option
feature of the uCMA to adjust connect request timeout and retry values. The
defaults are a little quick for some consumers. They are now bumped up from 3
retries to 15 and are tunable with uDAPL environment
James,
Here is a patch to the openib-cma provider that uses the new set_option feature
of the uCMA to
adjust connect request timeout and retry values. The defaults are a little
quick for some consumers.
They are now bumped up from 3 retries to 15 and are tunable with uDAPL
environment variables
13 matches
Mail list logo
