Hi Eitan,
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 02:10, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> Thanks for applying the patch.
>
> Regarding the issues :
>
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >>+
> >>+ CL_ASSERT( p_pkey_tbl );
> >
> >
> > Should the other routines also assert on this or should this be
> > consistent with t
Hi Hal,
Thanks for applying the patch.
Regarding the issues :
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>+
>>+ CL_ASSERT( p_pkey_tbl );
>
>
> Should the other routines also assert on this or should this be
> consistent with the others ?
Yes it should b consistent.
Normally I add assertion on OUT parameters s
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 15:05, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hi Hal
>
> This is a 5th take after incorporating Sasha's last reported bug
> on bad assignment of the used_blocks.
>
> This code was run again through my verification flow and also Sasha
> had run some tests too.
>
> Eitan
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hi Hal
This is a 5th take after incorporating Sasha's last reported bug
on bad assignment of the used_blocks.
This code was run again through my verification flow and also Sasha
had run some tests too.
Eitan
Signed-off-by: Eitan Zahavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: include/opensm/osm_port.h
===
