On 17:04 Wed 17 Jan , Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:02 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
>
> >>1. Putting the MPI release in git provides a level of OFED-specific
> >>history and version control. This was explicitly stated on the call
> >>yesterday.
> >
> >Which history information we
On 00:22 Thu 18 Jan , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > I don't really care one way or another; this was just my
> > > understanding of why it was requested.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Jeff is correct - I requested this from the reasons above.
>
> I think all we need for OFED is just a *fixe
This is such a trivial matter that it really isn't worth arguing
about. :-)
Tell us MPI guys how you want MPI releases published to OFED and
we'll do it.
On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> I don't really care one way or another; this was just my
>>> understanding of
> > I don't really care one way or another; this was just my
> > understanding of why it was requested.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Jeff is correct - I requested this from the reasons above.
I think all we need for OFED is just a *fixed* URL where OFED
build script can download the OFED-specific SRPM for
On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:02 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
>> 1. Putting the MPI release in git provides a level of OFED-specific
>> history and version control. This was explicitly stated on the call
>> yesterday.
>
> Which history information we are expecting to see between bin-file-
> ver1
> and bi
On 13:34 Tue 16 Jan , Jeff Squyres wrote:
> FWIW, having git's for the MPI implementations was asked for on the
> call yesterday (by Tziporet, IIRC?). The rationale, as I understood
> it, was threefold:
>
> 1. Putting the MPI release in git provides a level of OFED-specific
> history an
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> FWIW, having git's for the MPI implementations was asked for on the
> call yesterday (by Tziporet, IIRC?). The rationale, as I understood
> it, was threefold:
>
> 1. Putting the MPI release in git provides a level of OFED-specific
> history and version control. This wa
On Jan 16, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> FWIW, having git's for the MPI implementations was asked for on the
> call yesterday (by Tziporet, IIRC?). The rationale, as I understood
> it, was threefold:
Threefold, fourfold, tenfold... who's counting? :-)
--
Jeff Squyres
Server Virtuali
FWIW, having git's for the MPI implementations was asked for on the
call yesterday (by Tziporet, IIRC?). The rationale, as I understood
it, was threefold:
1. Putting the MPI release in git provides a level of OFED-specific
history and version control. This was explicitly stated on the call
> Quoting Woodruff, Robert J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [openfabrics-ewg] Reminder: OFED 1.2
>
> Sasha wrote,
> >On 17:25 Mon 15 Jan , Tziporet Koren wrote:
> > Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> > >
> > > Shaun Roland from my group (cc'ed in this e-mail) will be in charge of
> > > this. Vla
Sasha wrote,
>On 17:25 Mon 15 Jan , Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> >
> > Shaun Roland from my group (cc'ed in this e-mail) will be in charge
of
> > this. Vlad and Shaun can communicate.
> >
> >
> Hi Shaun,
> Please open an account in the OFA server so you will be able to
On 17:25 Mon 15 Jan , Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> >
> > Shaun Roland from my group (cc'ed in this e-mail) will be in charge of
> > this. Vlad and Shaun can communicate.
> >
> >
> Hi Shaun,
> Please open an account in the OFA server so you will be able to have a
> git
Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
>
> Shaun Roland from my group (cc'ed in this e-mail) will be in charge of
> this. Vlad and Shaun can communicate.
>
>
Hi Shaun,
Please open an account in the OFA server so you will be able to have a
git tree to place your SRPM
Contact Johann George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> >
> > We will be happy to prepare the SRPM.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > DK
> >
> >
> Can you send me the name of the person that is going to do it, so Vlad
> can work with him/her on OFED integration.
Shaun Roland from my group (cc'ed in this e-mail) will be in cha
Sandia and LLNL would also find MVAPICH2 useful.
Thanks,
- Matt
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 17:00 -0500, Stephen Poole wrote:
> I would find it very useful.
>
> Steve...
>
> Steve Poole
>
> Chief Scientist / Director of Special Projects
> Computer Science and Mathematics Division
>
> Chief
> Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> >> I'd like to explore adding MVAPICH2 to OFED 1.2, perhaps
> Dr Panda's team
> >> can help get the source RPM integrated with OFED 1.2.
> >>
> >
> > If the OFED community wants this, we will be happy to extend help.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > DK
> >
> For Open M
Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
>> I'd like to explore adding MVAPICH2 to OFED 1.2, perhaps Dr Panda's team
>> can help get the source RPM integrated with OFED 1.2.
>>
>
> If the OFED community wants this, we will be happy to extend help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> DK
>
For Open MPI we have Jeff from Cisco.
> > Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> > >> I'd like to explore adding MVAPICH2 to OFED 1.2, perhaps
> > Dr Panda's team
> > >> can help get the source RPM integrated with OFED 1.2.
> > >>
> > >
> > > If the OFED community wants this, we will be happy to extend help.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
>
> We will be happy to prepare the SRPM.
>
> Thanks,
>
> DK
>
>
Can you send me the name of the person that is going to do it, so Vlad
can work with him/her on OFED integration.
Note that we will need the package this week so we will be able to
update OFED install sc
f the lifelong attempt to
acquire it" Albert Einstein
--
> From: Dhabaleswar Panda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:32:15 -0500 (EST)
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] Reminder
At 01:32 PM 1/12/2007, Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> > I'd like to explore adding MVAPICH2 to OFED 1.2, perhaps Dr Panda's team
> > can help get the source RPM integrated with OFED 1.2.
>
>If the OFED community wants this, we will be happy to extend help.
I want it.
* Corre
> I'd like to explore adding MVAPICH2 to OFED 1.2, perhaps Dr Panda's team
> can help get the source RPM integrated with OFED 1.2.
If the OFED community wants this, we will be happy to extend help.
Thanks,
DK
> Scott Weitzenkamp
> SQA and Release Manager
> Server Virtualization Business Unit
>
Hello Tziporet and others from ofed board!
I wish to know if and how ehca could transition from preview tech to
production state
for ofed 1.2, especially what do we need to accomplish in order to achieve
that. If
you could point me to a written procedure for that, it would be great.
Thanks!
Nam
_
23 matches
Mail list logo
