Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-12 Thread Sean Hefty
Thanks for the info. I just updated my git version, and it worked fine. - Sean ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-12 Thread Roland Dreier
I just tried it and it seems to be working now. As a side note, if you have Linus's tree sitting around, with newish git (I'm not sure if this is in git 1.2 but it's definitely in 1.3), you can do git clone --reference http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git an

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-12 Thread Roland Dreier
> "Sean" == Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sean> I consistently get a URL error: 504... error: Unable to find Sean> 2ac5. under http://git... every time I try to clone your Sean> git tree. Is there a mirror that I can try cloning from, or Sean> do you know of an al

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-12 Thread Sean Hefty
I consistently get a URL error: 504... error: Unable to find 2ac5. under http://git... every time I try to clone your git tree. Is there a mirror that I can try cloning from, or do you know of an alternative way of getting the tree? ___ openib-gen

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-11 Thread Roland Dreier
Shirley> If you think there are enough time to review these Shirley> patches and have more chance to be merged into 2.6.17/18, Shirley> I will clean and submit these patches ASAP, and test on Shirley> ehca if none multi-threads ehca is available. 2.6.17 is closed for this sort of t

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-11 Thread Shirley Ma
Roland, By all the data I have collected so far I think it's not a good idea to have while loop poll_cq() under IB hardware interrupt context. poll_cq() is very expensive, and it increases other hardwares' interrupt latency. If we move this out of hardware interrupt context, latency would be ince

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
Grant> SDP is still missing. I just think SDP is a substantial Grant> peice of the story for IB adoption. Sorry, I won't be able Grant> to contribute much here. It doesn't seem very realistic to expect to merge SDP for 2.6.18. The current codebase is very much a work in progress tha

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-10 Thread Grant Grundler
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:41:40PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: ... > For 2.6.18, I have the following major things already queued (in > addition to a trivial mthca patch): SDP is still missing. I just think SDP is a substantial peice of the story for IB adoption. Sorry, I won't be able to contribu

RE: [openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-10 Thread Sean Hefty
> - CMA. Sean, I think there have been a lot of updates to the cma > since the last time you updated me. Can you send me a patch to > resync my for-2.6.18 branch with the latest code for upstream? I will start on this by the end of the week. - Sean __

[openib-general] 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 merge plans

2006-05-10 Thread Roland Dreier
As the 2.6.17 release cycle starts to wrap up, I thought it would be a good time to send out a report on my status, and a request for patches. All I have queued up for 2.6.17 that isn't upstream already is the one-liner patch fixing the ipath PCI device ID table. If there is anything else you thi