Re: [openib-general] Multicast traffic performace of OFED 1.0 ipoib

2006-08-02 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Moni Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We are looking for the max PPT rate (100 byte packets size) without > losses Maybe IPoIB send side is faster than the receive side, so you are overflowing the RQ? Would not the number of packets arrived be a better bechmark? -- MST __

Re: [openib-general] Multicast traffic performace of OFED 1.0 ipoib

2006-08-02 Thread Michael Krause
Is the performance being measured on an identical topology and hardware set as before?  Multicast by its very nature is sensitive to topology, hardware components used (buffer depth, latency, etc.) and workload occurring within the fabric.  Loss occurs as a function of congestion or lack of forw

Re: [openib-general] Multicast traffic performace of OFED 1.0 ipoib

2006-08-02 Thread Tziporet Koren
Moni Levy wrote: > > We are going to look into it and try to see where is the time spent, > but any ideas are welcome. > > Best regards, > Moni We will try to investigate it and let you know. Tziporet ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@op

[openib-general] Multicast traffic performace of OFED 1.0 ipoib

2006-08-02 Thread Moni Levy
Hi, we are doing some performance testing of multicast traffic over ipoib. The tests are performed by using iperf on dual 1.6G AMD PCI-X servers with PCI-X Tavor cards with 3.4.FW. Below are the command the may be used to run the test. Iperf server: route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 240.0.0.0