Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Could be a compiler thing: maybe cm_issue_rej is used in ore than
> one place? To make sure, you can try removing the static
> keryword and see if this appears.
That could be. cm_issue_rej is called from multiple locations, whereas
cm_issue_drep is not.
- Sean
_
Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: OFED 1.1 release schedule
>
> Tziporet Koren wrote:
> > I checked it and saw that the patch is applied, but since in the patch
> > Sean put the cm_issue_drep as a static, thus nm does not show it.
> > from the patch: +static int cm_issue_d
Tziporet Koren wrote:
> I checked it and saw that the patch is applied, but since in the patch
> Sean put the cm_issue_drep as a static, thus nm does not show it.
> from the patch: +static int cm_issue_drep(struct cm_port *port,
cm_issue_rej is also static, but shows up.
> Do you really need the
Arlin Davis wrote:
> Can someone double check the ib_cm kernel patch
> (sean_cm_drep_on_not_found.patch) again and verify the build process. I
> don't see the cm_issue_drep symbol in an RC7 build. From the build logs
> it appears that the patch is applied but I do not see the symbol in the
>
Tziporet Koren wrote:
> This is the plan to do the 1.1 release this week:
>
>
>
> We will publish 1.1-pre1 package tomorrow (Tue. 17-Oct)
>
> Only blocker issues from RC7 will be updated:
>
>1. SRP fix for Cisco FC gateway
>2. Small updates for the install
>3. Fix in diagnet to suppo
This is the plan to do the 1.1 release this week:
We will publish 1.1-pre1 package tomorrow (Tue. 17-Oct)
Only blocker issues from RC7 will be updated:
SRP fix for Cisco FC gateway
Small updates for the install
Fix in diagnet to support SM on a switch
Activate scaling code of ehc
Tziporet Koren; OpenFabricsEWG; openib
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] OFED 1.1 release - schedule and features
>
> > So if the link which ib0 maps to is DOWN you move the ib0 IPv4
address > to
> another device whose link is UP (eg ib1) and you somehow have ib1 >
send a
> gratuitous A
Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: OFED 1.1 release - schedule and features
>
> > So if the link which ib0 maps to is DOWN you move the ib0 IPv4 address
> > to another device whose link is UP (eg ib1) and you somehow have ib1
> > send a gratuitous ARP?
>
> I think the
> So if the link which ib0 maps to is DOWN you move the ib0 IPv4 address
> to another device whose link is UP (eg ib1) and you somehow have ib1
> send a gratuitous ARP?
I think there may be a problem in the way IPoIB deals with gratuitous
ARPs. Because if a neighbour structure is updated by th
> BTW - we will need your help regarding SRP daemon changes that were
> implemented by Ishai for OFED 1.0 but have not make it then.
Hmm, I haven't seen any SRP daemon stuff that looked suitable yet. Is
there going to be an updated version sent out soon?
- R.
Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> Since the technical details were not in this mail some features seems a
>> > * IPoIB
>> > - Bonding - for high availability
>> that have had no work done (in public at least) yet to be integrated.
>> If 1.1 is going to go to code
Roland Dreier wrote:
> To me this schedule seems too short to expect real new features like
>
Since the technical details were not in this mail some features seems a
lot of changes while they are not (to be explained).
> > - HCA fatal - full flow support
>
We just want to use the cu
Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> Tziporet,
>
>
>> - Based on 0.97 (we will not move to 0.98 since we tested it and
>> found it is less stable then 0.97)
>>
>
> Could you please indicate which version of 0.9.8 you tested and what
> are the exact problems you have faced.
>
We are running
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>Quoting r. Arlin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>The latest uDAPL from the trunk and uCMA set option support is sufficient.
>>
>>
>
>Which options do you set? Retry/timeout or path as well?
>
>
>
Just retry/timeout.
Quoting r. Arlin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The latest uDAPL from the trunk and uCMA set option support is sufficient.
Which options do you set? Retry/timeout or path as well?
--
MST
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://o
Tziporet Koren wrote:
>
> • Core:
>
> – Set options in CMA & uCMA (needed for Intel MPI)
>
> – HCA fatal - full flow support
>
> – Huge pages support
>
>
> • uDAPL:
>
> – Scalability features needed for Intel MPI – take from trunk
>
> • Arlin & James – please reply if there are more features neede
To me this schedule seems too short to expect real new features like
> - HCA fatal - full flow support
> * IPoIB
> - Bonding - for high availability
that have had no work done (in public at least) yet to be integrated.
If 1.1 is going to go to code freeze in 19 days t
Tziporet,
> - Based on 0.97 (we will not move to 0.98 since we tested it and
> found it is less stable then 0.97)
Could you please indicate which version of 0.9.8 you tested and what
are the exact problems you have faced.
Please note that 0.9.8 has not been formally released yet. What is
At 12:59 AM 7/12/2006, Tziporet Koren wrote:
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
wrote:
> For SDP, I would like to see "improved stability" (maybe
you have this
> in mind under "beta quality"), also how about "AIO
support"? The rest
> of the list looks good.
>
Yes - beta quality means improved stab
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) wrote:
> For SDP, I would like to see "improved stability" (maybe you have this
> in mind under "beta quality"), also how about "AIO support"? The rest
> of the list looks good.
>
Yes - beta quality means improved stability.
AIO is not planed for 1.1 (schedule issu
Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> • IPoIB
>> – Bonding - for high availability
>
> Can you point me to the person/company which is working on this? I've
> started to look on it as well so we can exchange ideas and join forces.
Vlad and Eitan from Mellanox are working on this
>
>
>> •
ystems
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tziporet
KorenSent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:53 PMTo:
OpenFabricsEWGCc: openibSubject: [openib-general] OFED
1.1 release - schedule and features
Hi All,
I wish to start the release
process of OF
Tziporet Koren wrote:
> I wish to start the release process of OFED 1.1.
> • IPoIB
> – Bonding - for high availability
Can you point me to the person/company which is working on this? I've
started to look on it as well so we can exchange ideas and join forces.
> • iSER
Hi All,
I wish to start the release process of OFED 1.1.
I would like that we will have a meeting next Monday to
review this proposal of the release features and schedule.
If possible I wish to move the meeting hour from 9am PST to 11am or 11:30am PST
Tziporet
24 matches
Mail list logo
