[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] Opensm - duplicated guids handling - new

2006-01-23 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 03:26, Yael Kalka wrote: > Hi Hal, > > Here is a patch using O_NONBLOCK instead of the static variable. Thanks. Applied. > Thanks, > Yael > > > Signed-off-by: Yael Kalka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ openib-general mailing list ope

[openib-general] RE: [PATCH] Opensm - duplicated guids handling

2006-01-22 Thread Yael Kalka
Hi Hal, The configuration are 2 HCAs with duplicated GUIDs on 2 different machines, which are connected back-2-back. Regarding the duplicated guids issue itself - as you said, it is a fundamental violation. The problem is that we've had cases where there was such a violation, and since OpenSM didn

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] Opensm - duplicated guids handling

2006-01-19 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Yael, On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 07:08, Yael Kalka wrote: > Hi Hal, > > We've noticed that currently if we have 2 hcas with duplicated guids I renew my comment about duplicated GUIDs. This is a pretty fundamental thing that MUST not be violated per the IBA spec. I understand there are processes in