On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:17:18AM -0700, Michael Krause wrote:
> At 06:39 AM 7/13/2005, James Lentini wrote:
> >On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, xg wang wrote:
> >
> >> Frankly speaking, I can not distinguish the function of SDP and
> >> DAPL. Since Lustre is a file system, it runs on kernel. So I think
At 11:18 AM 7/13/2005, James Lentini wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Michael
Krause wrote:
At 06:39 AM 7/13/2005, James
Lentini wrote:
kDAPL was designed specifically
for RDMA networks with lots of features that allow you to control how the
network is used. This is good if you are writing new code,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Michael Krause wrote:
At 06:39 AM 7/13/2005, James Lentini wrote:
kDAPL was designed specifically for RDMA networks with lots of features
that allow you to control how the network is used. This is good if you are
writing new code, but means that old code needs substant
At 06:39 AM 7/13/2005, James Lentini wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, xg wang
wrote:
Frankly
speaking, I can not distinguish the function of SDP and DAPL. Since
Lustre is a file system, it runs on kernel. So I think maybe kDAPL is
better.
SDP stands for the Sockets Direct Protocol. The protocol i
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, xg wang wrote:
Frankly speaking, I can not distinguish the function of SDP and DAPL.
Since Lustre is a file system, it runs on kernel. So I think maybe kDAPL is
better.
SDP stands for the Sockets Direct Protocol. The protocol is
designed to support the Berkley Sock
