Re: [openib-general] Re: [DAPL] Provider initialialization

2006-04-05 Thread James Lentini
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote: > Hi James, > Does uDAPL support PPC64 architecture? On PPC64, the code expects __PPC64__ to be defined. The PPC64 support isn't as well tested as other architectures, so there may be some problems. ___

Re: [openib-general] Re: [DAPL] Provider initialialization

2006-04-05 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
Hi James, Does uDAPL support PPC64 architecture? Description: OS: Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) Kernel: 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 Arch: ppc64 I have the following compilation error: make -C src/userspace/dapl \ CPPFLAGS="-I../libibverbs/include/infiniband -I../librdmacm/include \ -I../libib

[openib-general] Re: [DAPL] Provider initialialization

2006-04-04 Thread James Lentini
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Arlin Davis wrote: > James Lentini wrote: > > > Arlin, > > > > As part of the uDAPL autotools patch, we changed the mechanism by > > which the uDAPL provider library's init and fini functions were > > specified. > > > > I've seen (and received reports) of systems on whic

[openib-general] Re: [DAPL] Provider initialialization

2006-04-04 Thread Arlin Davis
James Lentini wrote: Arlin, As part of the uDAPL autotools patch, we changed the mechanism by which the uDAPL provider library's init and fini functions were specified. I've seen (and received reports) of systems on which the init and fini functions are not being called. I'd like to move b