In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:19:55 +0530), Krishna
Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Couple of minor comments on this :
:
> 3. I guess there is no clean way to avoid changing all consumers of ll_addr
> to not worry
> about the padding after the length and before the
I suggest that the implementation discussion not be reflected on ipoverib.
I've bcc'd to ipoverib for this mail. Those interested in the details can
follow it on netdev/openib.
Thanks,
Vivek
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Krishna Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Roland,
>
> Couple of minor comm
(BHi Roland,
(B
(BCouple of minor comments on this :
(B
(B1 : In "+static int ndisc_addr_option_pad(unsigned short type)", change the function
(B name to ndisc_lladdr_option_pad() and the argument name to addr_type, to be
(B more precise ? addr_option seems confusing, unless it is
David, let me tkink about this.
Thanks.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:33:47 -0800), Roland
Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> +++ linux-bk/net/ipv6/ndisc.c 2005-01-14 21:20:55.736745091 -0800
> @@ -169,12 +169,33 @@
>
> #define NDISC_OPT_SPACE(len) (((len)+2+7)&~7)
>