[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

2004-12-27 Thread David S. Miller
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:19:26 -0800 Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave, did you want to handle the entire merge of the whole IB stack, > or just the net/ parts, which are pretty trivial and stand alone, > since AF_INFINIBAND is already defined in the tree? Send it all over. __

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

2004-12-27 Thread Roland Dreier
David> If Roland can resubmit his patch queue to me with the fixes David> folks have recommended to him, I can start merging this David> stuff in. Andrew has indicated to me that he has merged the whole InfiniBand patch into -mm now. Dave, did you want to handle the entire merge of th

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

2004-12-27 Thread David S. Miller
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:38:45 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:14:43 -0800), Roland > Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > > The following series of patches is the latest version of the OpenIB >

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

2004-12-19 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:14:43 -0800), Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > The following series of patches is the latest version of the OpenIB > InfiniBand drivers. We believe that this version is suitable for > merging when 2.6.11 opens (or into -mm immediate