On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 12:54, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Can you try this version?
Thanks. Applied.
-- Hal
___
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailm
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 12:54, Sean Hefty wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:18:32 -0500
> Can you try this version? I'll also revert back to the original code and see
> if
> I can apply the patch.
Don't bother (if you haven't already). This patch worked.
-- Hal
___
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:18:32 -0500
Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 12:13, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > Not sure what the issue is. Let me make sure that I've pulled the latest
> > code and
> > resubmit the patch.
>
> It looks right to me. Does it work for you ? Can y
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 12:13, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Not sure what the issue is. Let me make sure that I've pulled the latest
> code and
> resubmit the patch.
It looks right to me. Does it work for you ? Can you send a normal
rather than unified diff ?
-- Hal
_
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 20:41, Sean Hefty wrote:
This patch recovers from send queue errors on QP 0/1. (It should also "work" in the case
of fatal errors, but does not try to recover.) Code was tested by forcing send errors and
checking that the port could still go to active
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 20:41, Sean Hefty wrote:
> This patch recovers from send queue errors on QP 0/1. (It should also "work"
> in the case
> of fatal errors, but does not try to recover.) Code was tested by forcing
> send errors and
> checking that the port could still go to active.
>
> Pat
