On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 20:36 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Use the kernel settings. We cannot have this modified by each and every
> driver.
Fair enough.
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:24:28AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:10 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > I'm still a bit surprised, since in the rest of the kernel we are even
> > going from -O2 to -Os for getting better performance.
> >
> > Robert said he wanted to post s
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:10 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'm still a bit surprised, since in the rest of the kernel we are even
> going from -O2 to -Os for getting better performance.
>
> Robert said he wanted to post some numbers showing that -O3 is
> measurably better for you [1], but I haven'
> I'm still a bit surprised, since in the rest of the kernel we are even
> going from -O2 to -Os for getting better performance.
>
> Robert said he wanted to post some numbers showing that -O3 is
> measurably better for you [1], but I haven't seen them.
As you might have guessed, I kind of forg
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:35:48PM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
>...
> --- /dev/null Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 +
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/MakefileThu Mar 9 16:17:00 2006 -0800
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +EXTRA_CFLAGS += -O3
I'm still a bit surprised, since in the rest of the kernel
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:00:07AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Sam> Eventually - yes. But not just now. Kbuild was introduced
> Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made
> Sam> good sense to do so. But for now keeping Makefile is a good
> Sam> choice. Thi
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:00:07AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Sam> Eventually - yes. But not just now. Kbuild was introduced
> Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made
> Sam> good sense to do so. But for now keeping Makefile is a good
> Sam> choice. Thi
Sam> Eventually - yes. But not just now. Kbuild was introduced
Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made
Sam> good sense to do so. But for now keeping Makefile is a good
Sam> choice. This is anyway what people are used to.
OK, disregard my suggestion then.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:53:04AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > + depends on 64BIT && (PCIEPORTBUS || X86_HT)
>
> > --- /dev/null Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 +
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/Makefile Thu Mar 9 08:46:47 2006 -0800
>
> I've been suggesting that new files be c
> +depends on 64BIT && (PCIEPORTBUS || X86_HT)
Why do you depend on X86_HT? I think you got confused: the HT stands
for hyperthreading, not hypertransport. In fact if you compile a
kernel optimized for K8, X86_HT is disabled.
And why do you depend on PCIEPORTBUS? I don't see you using any
10 matches
Mail list logo
