Re: [openib-general] Re: Fwd: [Bug 91] sizeof(srp_indirect_buf) wrong on 64-bit platforms

2006-05-23 Thread Arne Redlich
Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roland, maybe this means we need scsi/srp.h in svn for now? svn is supposed to work on 2.6.16 ... As far as I can tell the bug in the header has no effect on how the IB SRP initiator works. Roland, I'm afraid it *does* have an effect,

[openib-general] Re: Fwd: [Bug 91] sizeof(srp_indirect_buf) wrong on 64-bit platforms

2006-05-22 Thread Roland Dreier
Roland, maybe this means we need scsi/srp.h in svn for now? svn is supposed to work on 2.6.16 ... As far as I can tell the bug in the header has no effect on how the IB SRP initiator works. - R. ___ openib-general mailing list

[openib-general] Re: Fwd: [Bug 91] sizeof(srp_indirect_buf) wrong on 64-bit platforms

2006-05-22 Thread Roland Dreier
Roland As far as I can tell the bug in the header has no effect Roland on how the IB SRP initiator works. And if it does have a practical impact, the best way to handle it would probably to get a fix into 2.6.16 via the -stable team. - R. ___