On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 05:08, Yael Kalka wrote:
> Attached is a patch to fix some casting issues in ib_types.h.
> In Linux it compiles fine, but under Windows I get compilation errors due to
> the problem.
Thanks. Applied.
___
openib-general mailing lis
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:13 -0700, Fab Tillier wrote:
> > From: Ryan, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:07 AM
> >
> > My recollection is Matt Leininger, could be wrong
>
> I believe that Matt was just the messenger, conveying his organization's
> position on t
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 10:38 -0700, Fab Tillier wrote:
> > From: Ronald G Minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:11 AM
> >
> > Roland Dreier wrote:
> >
> > > Actually I think the issue was somewhat different. Microsoft is so
> > > allergic to the GPL that they
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:26 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Why does the windows port needs a separate repository? Please just
> > check all windows code (not just opensm) into the openib repository.
>
> My understanding is that the labs, who control the OpenIB servers, re
> From: Ryan, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:07 AM
>
> My recollection is Matt Leininger, could be wrong
I believe that Matt was just the messenger, conveying his organization's
position on the matter. Whether or not we agree with that position is
immaterial
My recollection is Matt Leininger, could be wrong
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald G Minnich
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:05 AM
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Opensm
> From: Ronald G Minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:11 AM
>
> Roland Dreier wrote:
>
> > Actually I think the issue was somewhat different. Microsoft is so
> > allergic to the GPL that they asked for the code to be in a physically
> > separate repository.
>
> From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:08 AM
>
> Sean> My understanding is that the labs, who control the OpenIB
> Sean> servers, refused to host any Windows related code, forcing
> Sean> it to have a separate repository.
>
> Christo
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:19, Roland Dreier wrote:
> The Windows source tree is actually at svn://windows.openib.org/svn,
> so it is at openib.org. So, there's more than one repository, but
> given how little the code has in common with the Linux code, I don't
> think that's a big deal.
OpenSM and
Ronald> Actually, I kind of wish that the code were all at
Ronald> openib.org. Should we really pay that much heed to
Ronald> requests of this sort if it makes life hard for openib
Ronald> people?
The Windows source tree is actually at svn://windows.openib.org/svn,
so it is at open
Roland Dreier wrote:
Actually I think the issue was somewhat different. Microsoft is so
allergic to the GPL that they asked for the code to be in a physically
separate repository.
that makes much more sense, ah, well, not really, but it is easier to
understand. I doubt the Labs would have
Sean> My understanding is that the labs, who control the OpenIB
Sean> servers, refused to host any Windows related code, forcing
Sean> it to have a separate repository.
Christoph> It shouldn't be difficult to find someone to host it.
Christoph> I could maybe ask if such a repo
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:26:31AM -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
My understanding is that the labs, who control the OpenIB servers, refused
to host any Windows related code, forcing it to have a separate repository.
wow, that's news to me! Maybe I'm at the wrong lab!
Anybody have a source for t
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:26:31AM -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >Why does the windows port needs a separate repository? Please just
> >check all windows code (not just opensm) into the openib repository.
>
> My understanding is that the labs, who control the OpenIB server
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Why does the windows port needs a separate repository? Please just
check all windows code (not just opensm) into the openib repository.
My understanding is that the labs, who control the OpenIB servers, refused to
host any Windows related code, forcing it to have a se
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:16:01PM +0300, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> The answer here is a little more complex:
> The WinIB repository will be used to keep the windows code.
> However, we are looking for a way to automatically update it
> with changes from the OpenIB trunk. So we are looking for
> having
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Eitan Zahavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Also, is the OpenIB svn tree the master code repository for OpenSM
for
both Linux and Windows ?
The answer here is a little more complex:
The WinIB repository will be used to keep the windows code.
However, we are looking
Quoting Eitan Zahavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Also, is the OpenIB svn tree the master code repository for OpenSM for
> > both Linux and Windows ?
>
> The answer here is a little more complex:
> The WinIB repository will be used to keep the windows code.
> However, we are looking for a way to automa
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi Yael,
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 05:08, Yael Kalka wrote:
Attached is a patch to fix some casting issues in ib_types.h.
In Linux it compiles fine, but under Windows I get compilation errors
due to the problem.
Have the casting changes been tested (as well as compiled) ?
Hi Yael,
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 05:08, Yael Kalka wrote:
> Attached is a patch to fix some casting issues in ib_types.h.
> In Linux it compiles fine, but under Windows I get compilation errors due to
> the problem.
Have the casting changes been tested (as well as compiled) ?
Also, is the OpenIB
20 matches
Mail list logo
