On 24.01.2006 [20:54:38 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many
> > kernels,many svn trees)
> >
> > On 24.01.2006 [01:44:42 +0200], Michael
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many
> kernels,many svn trees)
>
> On 24.01.2006 [01:44:42 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 24.01.2006 [01:44:42 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I have just uploaded a simple utility which I called clock_test which
> > > measures a clock once a second: this way you'll know whether mtfb
> > > is measuring time properly.
> >
Michael> I just added some cycle calibration code to
Michael> get_cpu_mhz(). Check it out (you can just run
Michael> clock_test).
Seems to work well. On the same JS20 system:
Warning: measured CPU frequency value14.317 differs from nominal 2194.62
1 sec = 1.00254e+06 usec
1 sec = 1.
Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many
> kernels, many svn trees)
>
> Michael> Could the high/low bits be swapped? What happends if you
> Michael> change cycles_t from long l
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What happends if you change cycles_t from long long to long?
> > Could you try running the clock_test utility?
>
> I'll try the latter first (I found the usage from the file and it is
> built by make). Could you send me a patch to do the form
Michael> Could the high/low bits be swapped? What happends if you
Michael> change cycles_t from long long to long? Could you try
Michael> running the clock_test utility?
What seems to be happening is that mftb is giving the low 32 bits of
the timebase (as expected on ppc32). Since y
On 24.01.2006 [01:39:07 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees)
> >
> > On 23.01.2006 [23:22:45 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAI
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have just uploaded a simple utility which I called clock_test which
> > measures a clock once a second: this way you'll know whether mtfb
> > is measuring time properly.
>
> Will it get built by running make in the perftest directory?
Yes.
On 24.01.2006 [01:01:32 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Looks like 5162/5163 is fine building wise. Here is what I got for
> > rdma_lat for a 32-bit server and 32-bit client:
> >
> > loading libehca local address: LID 0x0d QPN 0x140406
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees)
>
> On 23.01.2006 [23:22:45 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (man
On 23.01.2006 [23:22:45 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees)
> >
> > On 23.01.2006 [10:24:12 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Mich
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Looks like 5162/5163 is fine building wise. Here is what I got for
> rdma_lat for a 32-bit server and 32-bit client:
>
> loading libehca local address: LID 0x0d QPN 0x140406 PSN 0x253f3e RKey
> 0x2340032 VAddr 0x0010019001
> remote add
On 23.01.2006 [23:22:45 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees)
> >
> > On 23.01.2006 [10:24:12 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Mich
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees)
>
> On 23.01.2006 [10:24:12 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting r. Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23.01.2006 [10:24:12 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting r. Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,?many svn trees)
> > >
> > >
> > > >If true, it seems that this line
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,?many svn trees)
>
> On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting r. Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernel
On 23.01.2006 [19:55:05 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,?many svn trees)
> >
> >
> > >If true, it seems that this line
> > >typedef unsigned long long cycles_t;
> > >should be replaced by
>
Quoting r. Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,?many svn trees)
>
>
> >If true, it seems that this line
> >typedef unsigned long long cycles_t;
> >should be replaced by
> >typedef unsigned long cycles_t;
>
> Yes.
OK, I did it this way.
#
On 23.01.2006 [18:53:58 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees)
> >
> > On 23.01.2006 [18:46:42 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAI
Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees)
>
> On 23.01.2006 [18:46:42 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Bah, I just noticed that perftests doesn't even
21 matches
Mail list logo
