On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:29, Tom Duffy wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:11 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > The log indicates that the MTU is 4 which is 2048. I also saw this in
> > the IB trace.
The issue is that Solaris is pendantic about the selectors. OpenIB
OpenSM was not filling in the MTUS
Tom Duffy wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:21 -0800, Nitin Hande wrote:
Allright, so I am not seeing this anymore on the test setup here. I will
keep a watch and conduct some more experiments over weekend if time permits.
Does that mean you fixed it? Or can't reproduce it? Can you ping or
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:21 -0800, Nitin Hande wrote:
> Allright, so I am not seeing this anymore on the test setup here. I will
> keep a watch and conduct some more experiments over weekend if time permits.
Does that mean you fixed it? Or can't reproduce it? Can you ping or
put any traffic ov
Tom Duffy wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:11 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
The log indicates that the MTU is 4 which is 2048. I also saw this in
the IB trace.
Ok, I will ask some other Solaris IB guys as well...
Yes, I would like the patch.
BTW, Solaris does work now (Yippie),
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:11 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> The log indicates that the MTU is 4 which is 2048. I also saw this in
> the IB trace.
Ok, I will ask some other Solaris IB guys as well...
> > Yes, I would like the patch.
BTW, Solaris does work now (Yippie), even without this patch
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:08, Tom Duffy wrote:
> [ Putting on OpenIB ]
>
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 19:43 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > Hey Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 19:35, Tom Duffy wrote:
> > > Solaris, you need to "ifconfig ibd0 plumb" to see it in ifconfig -a. You
> > > are further th
[ Putting on OpenIB ]
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 19:43 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 19:35, Tom Duffy wrote:
> > Solaris, you need to "ifconfig ibd0 plumb" to see it in ifconfig -a. You
> > are further than me since you see /dev/ibd0. You might even be there...
>