[openib-general] Re: Solaris 10 with OpenIB OpenSM

2005-02-12 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:29, Tom Duffy wrote: On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:11 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: The log indicates that the MTU is 4 which is 2048. I also saw this in the IB trace. The issue is that Solaris is pendantic about the selectors. OpenIB OpenSM was not filling in the

[openib-general] Re: Solaris 10 with OpenIB OpenSM

2005-02-11 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:08, Tom Duffy wrote: [ Putting on OpenIB ] On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 19:43 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: Hey Tom, On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 19:35, Tom Duffy wrote: Solaris, you need to ifconfig ibd0 plumb to see it in ifconfig -a. You are further than me since you

[openib-general] Re: Solaris 10 with OpenIB OpenSM

2005-02-11 Thread Nitin Hande
Tom Duffy wrote: On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:11 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: The log indicates that the MTU is 4 which is 2048. I also saw this in the IB trace. Ok, I will ask some other Solaris IB guys as well... Yes, I would like the patch. BTW, Solaris does work now (Yippie),

[openib-general] Re: Solaris 10 with OpenIB OpenSM

2005-02-11 Thread Tom Duffy
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:21 -0800, Nitin Hande wrote: Allright, so I am not seeing this anymore on the test setup here. I will keep a watch and conduct some more experiments over weekend if time permits. Does that mean you fixed it? Or can't reproduce it? Can you ping or put any traffic

[openib-general] Re: Solaris 10 with OpenIB OpenSM

2005-02-11 Thread Nitin Hande
Tom Duffy wrote: On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 20:21 -0800, Nitin Hande wrote: Allright, so I am not seeing this anymore on the test setup here. I will keep a watch and conduct some more experiments over weekend if time permits. Does that mean you fixed it? Or can't reproduce it? Can you ping