On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:16:25PM -0700, Manpreet Singh wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Thanks for the updated rpms. Just curious as to what svn revision of openib
> you used for the rpms.
>
> Do the IB tools (if compiled separately) have to be from the same svn
> revision?
Usually, they don't have to be id
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:30:04AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Just to make that point
> > clear, I've removed the old RPMs from my site and put up a new set of kernel
> > rpms based on the 1.0 release branch code (userspace rpms will be a lit
Doug,
Thanks for the updated rpms. Just curious as to what svn revision of openib you used for the rpms.
Do the IB tools (if compiled separately) have to be from the same svn revision?
Thanks,
Manpreet.
On 4/6/06, Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:04:29PM -0700,
Quoting r. Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just to make that point
> clear, I've removed the old RPMs from my site and put up a new set of kernel
> rpms based on the 1.0 release branch code (userspace rpms will be a little
> later).
Doug, is this
https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.0/src/li
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:04:29PM -0700, Manpreet Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am observing the following with redhat kernel rpm at:
> http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband , which uses openib version
> 3965. This is on an RHEL4 install.
>
> When the system is rebooted, ib_core, ib_mad and ib
