On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 15:46, James Lentini wrote:
> Hal,
>
> Did you reproduce this on x86 or x86_64?
I did it on x86. I didn't try on x86_64 but could.
-- Hal
>
> On Wed, 11 May 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> halr> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 13:32, Tom Duffy wrote:
> halr> > Can you reproduce t
Hal,
Did you reproduce this on x86 or x86_64?
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
halr> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 13:32, Tom Duffy wrote:
halr> > Can you reproduce this on your end? I am still seeing it every time I
halr> > run the kdapltest program on x86_64 with slab debugging turned on.
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 13:32, Tom Duffy wrote:
> Can you reproduce this on your end? I am still seeing it every time I
> run the kdapltest program on x86_64 with slab debugging turned on. With
> the latest bits (v2305).
Yes, I can reproduce it and did spend some time looking at it but do not
have
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 10:46 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 10:39, James Lentini wrote:
> > The slab corruption message below seems to involve IBAT's
> > req_comp_work function. Any ideas?
>
> I looked at this over the weekend and still don't have a working theory.
> req_comp
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 10:39, James Lentini wrote:
> The slab corruption message below seems to involve IBAT's
> req_comp_work function. Any ideas?
I looked at this over the weekend and still don't have a working theory.
req_comp_work calls req_free which based on the pend->type frees the (in
this
Shahar,
The slab corruption message below seems to involve IBAT's
req_comp_work function. Any ideas?
james
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 01:54 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Is the client connecting to a server which is present or not ?
Yes, the client *is* connecting t
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 01:54 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Is the client connecting to a server which is present or not ?
Yes, the client *is* connecting to the server. Here is the full client
side transaction:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ./kdapltest -T Q -s 192.168.0.26 -D mthca0a -d
Server Name: 192
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 20:27, Tom Duffy wrote:
> But, I am still seeing this slab corruption every time I run the test,
> on the active side:
>
> Slab corruption: start=81002353edb0, len=288
> Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071.
> Last user: [](req_comp_work+0x54/0x90 [ib_at])
> 040: 00 00 00 00 0
