Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: neigh destructor work-around
>
> OK, I applied this to svn. I changed
>
> > +static spinlock_t ipoib_all_neigh_list_lock;
>
> and
>
> > + spin_lock_init(&ipoib_all_neigh_list_lock);
>
> to just
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ipoib_a
OK, I applied this to svn. I changed
> +static spinlock_t ipoib_all_neigh_list_lock;
and
> +spin_lock_init(&ipoib_all_neigh_list_lock);
to just
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ipoib_all_neigh_list_lock);
There's not some subtle reason for using spin_lock_init() at runtime,
is there?
- R.
