, Tom Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Solaris IPoIB MTU with OpenSM
Date: 24 Feb 2005 08:42:23 -0500
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 17:19, Nitin Hande wrote:
Hal,
[comments below]
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 02:19, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:56
Nitin On other hand, on my linux node, if I try to use 8001
Nitin partition and configure IB interface with IP addr (same
Nitin time while ib0 is using 0x pkey), I get the following
Nitin error, you may want to investigate that
I think this is probably an OpenSM issue
Hi Nitin,
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 16:15, Nitin Hande wrote:
This is cool, I have got Solaris IPoIB happily working with the
OpenSM now. It plumbs, pings and snoops on 0x pkey.
Great. That's good news. I'll work on a real fix for this now.
On other hand, on my linux node, if I try to use
Hande [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: openib openib-general@openib.org, Tom Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Solaris IPoIB MTU with OpenSM
Date: 24 Feb 2005 08:42:23 -0500
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 17:19, Nitin Hande wrote:
Hal,
[comments below]
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 02:19
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 17:19, Nitin Hande wrote:
Hal,
[comments below]
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 02:19, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:56, Nitin Hande wrote:
So I tried the latest patches and preliminarily things seem to be
working fine.
Yipee.
[snip..]
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:56, Nitin Hande wrote:
So I tried the latest patches and preliminarily things seem to be
working fine.
Yipee.
The PathRecord response is successful and so is the MTU
correct. I need to spend some more time looking at MAD and confirm it. I
could configure both
Hal,
[comments below]
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 02:19, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:56, Nitin Hande wrote:
So I tried the latest patches and preliminarily things seem to be
working fine.
Yipee.
[snip..]
So after this test above, I try to run snoop on the solaris
Hal,
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:12, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 17:33, Nitin Hande wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 13:26, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 16:08, Nitin Hande wrote:
Hal,
[snip..]
[snip...]
Before the patch the
Hi Nitin,
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 17:33, Nitin Hande wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 13:26, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 16:08, Nitin Hande wrote:
Hal,
[snip..]
Here is the trace of 256 sized MTU:
Outgoing MAD:
BaseVersion: 0x1
MgmtClass:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 16:36, Nitin Hande wrote:
I have a hunch for whats happening here, but before I jump into any
conclusions, I am seeing some other issue between Solaris IPoIB driver
and OpenSM. After joining the Broadcast group, the PathRecord Response
coming from OpenSM signals an error
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 13:26, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 16:08, Nitin Hande wrote:
Hal,
[snip..]
Here is the trace of 256 sized MTU:
Outgoing MAD:
BaseVersion: 0x1
MgmtClass: 0x3 - SubnAdm
ClassVersion: 0x2
R_Method: 0x12 -
I have a hunch for whats happening here, but before I jump into any
conclusions, I am seeing some other issue between Solaris IPoIB driver
and OpenSM. After joining the Broadcast group, the PathRecord Response
coming from OpenSM signals an error with Invalid GUID. I wonder why,
Here is the mad
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 16:36, Nitin Hande wrote:
I have a hunch for whats happening here,
Glad to hear this as I don't have a clue :-)
but before I jump into any
conclusions, I am seeing some other issue between Solaris IPoIB driver
and OpenSM. After joining the Broadcast group, the
Hi again Nitin,
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 16:36, Nitin Hande wrote:
After joining the Broadcast group, the PathRecord Response
coming from OpenSM signals an error with Invalid GUID. I wonder why,
There appear to be only 2 places in the code (I'm not saying the code is
right) where this can occur.
Hi Nitin,
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 16:45, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Can you look in the osm.log to see if the source or dest GID is
implicated ? This will help me chase it down. Thanks.
Both SGID and DGID are in the component mask but my bet is on the DGID.
OpenSM does not currently support
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:45, Nitin Hande wrote:
Here is the osm log, I think we may have a lead, the dest GID is wrong:
:
Feb 15 23:29:57 [43005960] - osm_sm_mcgrp_join: Port 0x0002c901097651d1
joining MLID 0xC001.
Feb 15 23:29:57 [43005960] - __osm_pr_rcv_get_end_points: No dest port
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 15:57, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 17:45, Nitin Hande wrote:
Here is the osm log, I think we may have a lead, the dest GID is wrong:
:
Feb 15 23:29:57 [43005960] - osm_sm_mcgrp_join: Port 0x0002c901097651d1
joining MLID 0xC001.
Feb 15 23:29:57
17 matches
Mail list logo
