On Oct 18, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
One feature that bugzilla has (and that seems to be disabled in
openib bugzilla
:() is mail integration, where I can Cc bugzilla and mail contents
will get
attached to bug report. I was hoping that new server will have this
capability. Does
On Oct 17, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It seems like trac can integrate with both SVN and git and would also
provide us with integrated wiki capabilities.
One feature that bugzilla has (and that seems to be disabled in
openib bugzilla
:() is mail integration, where I can
I was not on the call last week, but I understand that there was some
discussion about exactly this point (ditch SVN and go 100% git): the
decision was to stick with SVN for userspace stuff and stick with git
for kernel stuff.
However, this is a larger audience than was on the call. Is
Quoting r. Jeff Squyres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, this is a larger audience than was on the call. Is there a
significant movement here from the developers to move to 100% git?
Life would be somewhat easier for me with 100% git.
--
MST
___
On Oct 17, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Developers had requested git 1.4, but Ubuntu had an older
version. We
went ahead and installed git from source. I'd prefer to stick to
Ubuntu
packages if possible.
We have much to gain from newer versions - just look at gitweb
Quoting r. Jeff Squyres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone have any sysadmin cycles to do this kind of stuff? I
would expect it to be a flurry of activity here in the beginning
followed by short bursts of activity separated by long periods of
nothing.
FWIW, I can help out keeping the git
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 14:39 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting r. Jeff Squyres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, this is a larger audience than was on the call. Is there a
significant movement here from the developers to move to 100% git?
Life would be somewhat easier for me with 100%
Steve Wise wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 14:39 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting r. Jeff Squyres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, this is a larger audience than was on the call. Is there a
significant movement here from the developers to move to 100% git?
Life would be
On 08:12 Wed 18 Oct , Jeff Squyres wrote:
I was not on the call last week, but I understand that there was some
discussion about exactly this point (ditch SVN and go 100% git): the
decision was to stick with SVN for userspace stuff and stick with git
for kernel stuff.
However,
Per the teleconference last week, I'd like to survey the developers
about the tools that should be installed on the new OFA server (is
there a plan to migrate there yet?).
As I understand it (please correct me if I get this wrong):
- The community has decided to stay with git for kernel
Quoting Jeff Squyres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Some version of git and svn are installed on the new server, but
that's about it
The tool versions installed on openib are ancient.
Can site admins please install latest svn and git versions from source?
--
MST
Quoting r. Jeff Squyres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It seems like trac can integrate with both SVN and git and would also
provide us with integrated wiki capabilities.
One feature that bugzilla has (and that seems to be disabled in openib bugzilla
:() is mail integration, where I can Cc bugzilla and
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 09:17 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Per the teleconference last week, I'd like to survey the developers
about the tools that should be installed on the new OFA server (is
there a plan to migrate there yet?).
As I understand it (please correct me if I get this wrong):
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Tools for development
Michael The tool versions installed on openib are ancient. Can
Michael site admins please install latest svn and git versions
Michael from source?
What distro is on the new
Michael But I think while generally using distro-supplied
Michael packages is the thing to do, for svn/git it makes sense
Michael to get the latest and grates and do the updates manually
Michael since they are the main services we get from openib.org -
Michael so getting more
-- Was there a plan for any consolidation of the various git
repositories?)
I don't see any reason to consolidate -- the whole point of git is
that it makes distributed development easier. Being able to have a
private tree that I can screw up and rebuild whenever I need to is
kind of
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 07:49 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
Michael The tool versions installed on openib are ancient. Can
Michael site admins please install latest svn and git versions
Michael from source?
What distro is on the new openfabrics.org server?
Ubuntu.
If it's
On 09:17 Tue 17 Oct , Jeff Squyres wrote:
Per the teleconference last week, I'd like to survey the developers
about the tools that should be installed on the new OFA server (is
there a plan to migrate there yet?).
As I understand it (please correct me if I get this wrong):
- The
On 17:04 Tue 17 Oct , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting r. Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At the risk of opening a can of worms, is there any reason we don't move
the user stuff into its own git tree? This would get rid of svn
altogether...
If we do, that should probably be multiple
Quoting r. Matt Leininger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Developers had requested git 1.4, but Ubuntu had an older version. We
went ahead and installed git from source. I'd prefer to stick to Ubuntu
packages if possible.
We have much to gain from newer versions - just look at gitweb change log.
But my
20 matches
Mail list logo
