Jeff Carr wrote:
On the client system:
# cat /sys/class/infiniband/mthca0/ports/1/lid
0x2
On the server system:
# cat /sys/class/infiniband/mthca0/ports/1/lid
0x3
modprobe ib_cmpost "slid=0x3" "dlid=0x2" "message_count=0x10"
"message_size=0x100"
slid is Source LID (not server). dlid is Dest
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:53, Sean Hefty wrote:
> And, yes, it would be really nice if the SM reassigned the same LIDs to the
> same nodes where possible.
It does this for some but not all cases now. LIDs are not persistent in
IB unless something above and beyond the IB spec is done.
SM would nee
On 06/02/05 15:27, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:09, Jeff Carr wrote:
Is there a simple way to discover the lid values of other systems?
Locally, you can run /usr/local/ib/bin/ibstatus or ibstat.
Remotely, you would need to know the remote GID (subnet prefix + GUID)
and ask
On 06/01/05 14:43, William Jordan wrote:
Has anyone seen ib_send_cm_req() return -22?
I'm not sure what you are testing with, Jeff, but I ran into the same
problem the first time I tried to use ucm_simple. The source and
destination lid and guid are embedded in the source, and need to be
modif
Jeff Carr wrote:
Is there a simple way to discover the lid values of other systems?
Simple? Not really. You could query the SA to obtain a list of path
records to all systems, and then extract the LIDs from those. I use:
cat /sys/class/infiniband/mthca0/ports/1/lid
to get the LIDs of bot
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:09, Jeff Carr wrote:
> Is there a simple way to discover the lid values of other systems?
Locally, you can run /usr/local/ib/bin/ibstatus or ibstat.
Remotely, you would need to know the remote GID (subnet prefix + GUID)
and ask the SA what the LID was for that (by getting
On 05/31/05 16:30, Sean Hefty wrote:
Has anyone seen ib_send_cm_req() return -22?
I believe that this is a timeout error, possibly indicating that the
server
side of the connection wasn't running. You may also want to verify the
slid
and dlid are correct for your configuration.
Don't
>Has anyone seen ib_send_cm_req() return -22?
I'm not sure what you are testing with, Jeff, but I ran into the same
problem the first time I tried to use ucm_simple. The source and
destination lid and guid are embedded in the source, and need to be
modified to fit the test systems. Otherwise you w
>> >Has anyone seen ib_send_cm_req() return -22?
>>
>> I believe that this is a timeout error, possibly indicating that the
>server
>> side of the connection wasn't running. You may also want to verify the
>slid
>> and dlid are correct for your configuration.
>
>Don't you get a REJ now when there
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 03:51, Sean Hefty wrote:
> >Has anyone seen ib_send_cm_req() return -22?
>
> I believe that this is a timeout error, possibly indicating that the server
> side of the connection wasn't running. You may also want to verify the slid
> and dlid are correct for your configurati
>Has anyone seen ib_send_cm_req() return -22?
I believe that this is a timeout error, possibly indicating that the server
side of the connection wasn't running. You may also want to verify the slid
and dlid are correct for your configuration.
- Sean
Has anyone seen ib_send_cm_req() return -22?
I seem to be stuck with this error today. I've seen it in the past; and
it seems to have gone away without my being able to discern a conclusive
reason. Usually rebooting the systems will cause it to work again.
This go around, It's really refusing
12 matches
Mail list logo
