At 02:43 PM 10/30/2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:29, Michael Krause wrote:
> > At 02:05 PM 10/30/2006, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > Hal> So rate = speed * width ?
> > >
> > >Yes, you should see the right think on DDR systems etc.
> >
> > Strange. Bandwidth = signaling rate
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:29, Michael Krause wrote:
> At 02:05 PM 10/30/2006, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Hal> So rate = speed * width ?
> >
> >Yes, you should see the right think on DDR systems etc.
>
> Strange. Bandwidth = signaling rate * width. This of course is raw
> bandwidth prior to en
At 02:05 PM 10/30/2006, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Hal> So rate = speed * width ?
>
>Yes, you should see the right think on DDR systems etc.
Strange. Bandwidth = signaling rate * width. This of course is raw
bandwidth prior to encoding, protocol, etc. overheads which will derate the
effective
Hal> So rate = speed * width ?
Yes, you should see the right think on DDR systems etc.
- R.
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:55, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Should support for speed be added to ibstatus ?
>
> What is "speed"? Is that something beyond the existing "rate" line:
>
> > rate:10 Gb/sec (4X)
So rate = speed * width ?
-- Hal
> - R.
> Should support for speed be added to ibstatus ?
What is "speed"? Is that something beyond the existing "rate" line:
> rate:10 Gb/sec (4X)
- R.
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailma
Should support for speed be added to ibstatus ?
Infiniband device 'mthca0' port 1 status:
default gid: fe80::::0008:f104:0396:0559
base lid:0xa
sm lid: 0xa
state: 1: DOWN
phys state: 2: Polling
rate:
