On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 21:45, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
[snip...]
> > I don't know if this is an HCA firmware issues, switch issue, or openSM
> > issue.
> > I don't think it's related to my changes or osmtest at this point.
>
> I'll see if I can reproduce this tomorrow.
I've followed your scenario
>> I don't know if this is an HCA firmware issues, switch issue, or openSM
>issue.
>> I don't think it's related to my changes or osmtest at this point.
>
>I'll see if I can reproduce this tomorrow.
>
>Also, can you send me the guid2lid files from the 3 SMs ?
I'll send this tomorrow. Before reloa
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 18:36, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > With the default sminfo_polling_timeout of 10 seconds and default
> > polling_retry_number of 4, so the total handoff time should be around 40
> > seconds. I just did that experiment with 2 SMs and saw that as well.
>
> Oka
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> With the default sminfo_polling_timeout of 10 seconds and default
> polling_retry_number of 4, so the total handoff time should be around 40
> seconds. I just did that experiment with 2 SMs and saw that as well.
Okay - I narrowed down the test case to something reproducible
