On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 13:59, Fab Tillier wrote:
> > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:26 AM
> >
> > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 13:14, Fab Tillier wrote:
> > >
> > > Just to be clear, you need to trap when the port goes to INIT, not
> > > ACTIVE. Also, w
> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:26 AM
>
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 13:14, Fab Tillier wrote:
> >
> > Just to be clear, you need to trap when the port goes to INIT, not
> > ACTIVE. Also, while the SM cares about DOWN/INIT, other ULPs tend to
> > care
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 13:14, Fab Tillier wrote:
> > From: Eitan Zahavi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:21 AM
> >
> > > Hal Wrote:
> > > The OpenSM vendor layer should be enhanced with an additional API for a
> > > local port state changed event (and take a flag for port
> From: Eitan Zahavi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:21 AM
>
> > Hal Wrote:
> > The OpenSM vendor layer should be enhanced with an additional API for a
> > local port state changed event (and take a flag for port down and port
> > up).
> >
> > OpenSM could then take this
Title: RE: [openib-general] User Level Events - request for support
> Hal Wrote:
> The OpenSM vendor layer should be enhanced with an additional API for a
> local port state changed event (and take a flag for port down and port
> up).
>
> OpenSM could then take this e
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 04:12, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> I would like to propose for gen2 stack to have a user level API
> supporting registration for notifications on unaffiliated asynchronous
> events.
>
> As an example in cases when the local IB port link goes down an SM
> that runs on top of this po
