-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wangxigui
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 7:09 AM
To: openib-general@openib.org
Subject: RE: [openib-general] how to choose appropriate ULPs for application
Thank you very much!
I'll read the materials that you supply.
I hav
FYI, you can find a kDAPL implementation for OpenIB at
svn/gen2/users/jlentini/linux-kernel
and a uDAPL implementation for OpenIB at
svn/gen2/users/jlentini/userspace
I can answer any questions you might have about these ULPs.
I'm not familiar with NAL, so I can't comment on which ULP is rig
I would also recommend studying DAFS, and in particular
the differences between DAFS and NFS over RDMA.
NFS over RDMA leaves most of the existing file system
logic intact and basically optimizes the exchange of
individual messages over RDMA.
Using SDP would be a somewhat similar strategy,
with sl
Thank you very much!
I'll read the materials that you supply.
I have not described my plan clearly. I don't konw how to run lustre
on IB. Neither do I konw the lustre running in kernel space or user
space. Now the lustre NAL does not supports IB vapi. If I use IPoIB,
it works. But it doen not
The quick answer here is none of SDP, iSER/SRP or uDAPL for different
reasons on each case
kDAPL is the kernel API that is designed to handle a kernel application
such as NFS, Lustre or the like. See:
http://www.datcollaborative.org/kdapl.html
There is are already implementations of NFS/
