Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Kernel panic after upgrading to OpenIndiana

2010-10-04 Thread Thorsten Heit
Michael michaelspriv...@gmail.com schrieb am 04.10.2010 12:12:13: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Thorsten Heit thorsten.h...@vkb.de wrote: Hi, It seems very easy to overlook, but it is my understanding that you always need to run these steps in a specific order: first just run

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Kernel panic after upgrading to OpenIndiana

2010-10-04 Thread Thorsten Heit
Hi, It seems very easy to overlook, but it is my understanding that you always need to run these steps in a specific order: first just run import by itself pfexec zpool import output will list pools available for import Great, didn't know about that. Thanks :-) Just run import by

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Kernel panic after upgrading to OpenIndiana

2010-10-04 Thread Michael
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Thorsten Heit thorsten.h...@vkb.de wrote: Hi, It seems very easy to overlook, but it is my understanding that you always need to run these steps in a specific order: first just run import by itself pfexec zpool import     output will list pools available

[OpenIndiana-discuss] NWAM / keyboard issues

2010-10-04 Thread Rob McMahon
First, thanks to the OpenIndiana people. It's just what we've all been waiting for, and I now have it installed on my laptop at home, a Toshiba Satellite Pro P300 (which is where I am just now), and my workstation at work, a Sun Ultra 20 M2. Two things have been biting me. On my (UK)

[OpenIndiana-discuss] OSOL together with OpenIndiana

2010-10-04 Thread Handojo
From my opinion, it is more stable to have separate drive / partition, one for OpenSolaris 2009.06, and another for OpenIndiana   Upgrading OpenSolaris 2008.05 with new package from 2009.06 result in slower machine response, so from this experience, it is easier for me just to destroy either

[OpenIndiana-discuss] SATA multiplexer support?

2010-10-04 Thread Ray Arachelian
Is there any SATA Multiplexer support for OI? I recall that OpenSolaris did not (yet) support this, if not any plans to? ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] openindiana more popular

2010-10-04 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Daniel Kjar wrote: I still think throwing hunt or some of the other old terminal based bsd games in there would be hilarious. nethack should be in sfw still. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] openindiana more popular

2010-10-04 Thread Hillel Lubman
I don't think there are really performance drawbacks for game development on OpenIndiana. Heavy games are anyway based on OpenGL, which in turn ends up in drivers quality. Sound is another sensitive issue, but interestingly, OpenSolaris uses OSS, which is better for game development, comparing to

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] openindiana more popular

2010-10-04 Thread Daniel Kjar
oh what a god awful time waster! Now I may have to play for a little while... On 10/ 4/10 04:25 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Daniel Kjar wrote: I still think throwing hunt or some of the other old terminal based bsd games in there would be hilarious. nethack should be in sfw still. --

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] openindiana more popular

2010-10-04 Thread Alasdair Lumsden
On 4 Oct 2010, at 21:22, Daniel Kjar wrote: I still think throwing hunt or some of the other old terminal based bsd games in there would be hilarious. I'd quite like to throw on some of the Infocom text adventure games :) Zork I, II and III were released as freeware. My favourite was The

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] SATA multiplexer support?

2010-10-04 Thread Christopher Chan
Ray Arachelian wrote: Is there any SATA Multiplexer support for OI? I recall that OpenSolaris did not (yet) support this, if not any plans to? Multiplexer support was added some time ago but not all sata chipset drivers were updated. ___