[OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity

2010-11-06 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? Thanks for the

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Building couchdb

2010-11-06 Thread Paul Johnston
On 11/ 6/10 04:47 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Paul Johnston paul.a.johns...@manchester.ac.uk wrote: Hi Continuing my attempt to build couchdb. Just wondering if anyone has sucessfully built it on OpenIndiana? I've got it to build but running it I get:

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity

2010-11-06 Thread Paul Johnston
On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In other words: is it worse, better or the

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Building couchdb

2010-11-06 Thread Moinak Ghosh
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Paul Johnston paul.a.johns...@manchester.ac.uk wrote: On 11/ 6/10 04:47 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote: [...] Fraid no joy yet! pa...@openindiana:~$ echo $LD_PRELOAD /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1 pa...@openindiana:~$ pfexec /usr/local/bin/couchdb Apache CouchDB 1.0.1

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity

2010-11-06 Thread taemun
I upgraded a b134 box to OI_147, and the only change I've noticed is that I now get: From r...@mirror.local Sat Nov 6 09:48:52 2010 Return-Path: r...@mirror.local Received: from mirror.local (mirror [127.0.0.1]) by mirror.local (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA5Mmqkf014916 for

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity

2010-11-06 Thread BM
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote: In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out and have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. Thanks. Other experiences? Yes, I can confirm that too. We're running few servers on production

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity

2010-11-06 Thread McBofh
On 6/11/10 09:15 PM, taemun wrote: I upgraded a b134 box to OI_147, and the only change I've noticed is that I now get: ... Your cron job on mirror /usr/lib/update-manager/update-refresh.sh produced the following output: /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:57:

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity

2010-11-06 Thread Vasten Tech
Power saving does not work. The machine will not go to sleep. On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 12:08 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity

2010-11-06 Thread solarg
On 06/11/10 12:08, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used to run a home server

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Building couchdb

2010-11-06 Thread Paul Johnston
On 11/ 6/10 11:04 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Paul Johnston paul.a.johns...@manchester.ac.uk wrote: On 11/ 6/10 04:47 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote: [...] Fraid no joy yet! pa...@openindiana:~$ echo $LD_PRELOAD /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1 pa...@openindiana:~$ pfexec

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Setting LD_PRELOAD

2010-11-06 Thread Paul Johnston
Under my thread about couchdb I was advised to set LD_PRELOAD. I thought this had not worked but is seems bigger than that :-) Then it appears that the LD_PRELOAD environment setting is not being passed onto the child. You need to try recompiling the executable beam.smp with

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Setting LD_PRELOAD

2010-11-06 Thread McBofh
On 7/11/10 08:57 AM, Paul Johnston wrote: Under my thread about couchdb I was advised to set LD_PRELOAD. I thought this had not worked but is seems bigger than that :-) Then it appears that the LD_PRELOAD environment setting is not being passed onto the child. You need to try recompiling the