Which Webmin version do you use or did you install?
The 1.47 version that comes from the pkg installer has a missetting for the
servicefacility. Please search the list for svcs & webmin and my
emailaddress.
If you have 1.47 running and try to update to 1.57 then you're back at
square 1. Because 1
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Hans J. Albertsson
wrote:
> I'm looking for some kind of user/system/services management tools that I
> could trust novices and Microsoft people to cope with..
>
> Some working webmin-like system would be nice, but the current webmin fails
> consistently on my
Hi,
Sorry for the wrong information. I was on a different machine.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ewald Ertl píše v pá 13. 01. 2012 v 19:42 +0100:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > could you send output from
>> >
Hi,
Ewald Ertl píše v pá 13. 01. 2012 v 19:42 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could you send output from
> >
> > g++ -v
> >
> > ?
> Here is the output:
>
> [ewer@sunray1:/sdk/vsop/V4.04_10/Release]>g++ -v
> Lese Spezifikationen von /usr/local
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you send output from
>
> g++ -v
>
> ?
Here is the output:
[ewer@sunray1:/sdk/vsop/V4.04_10/Release]>g++ -v
Lese Spezifikationen von /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.6/specs
Konfiguriert mit: ../configure --with-as=
I'm looking for some kind of user/system/services management tools that
I could trust novices and Microsoft people to cope with..
Some working webmin-like system would be nice, but the current webmin
fails consistently on my system.
I kind of liked smc, but that's not available, is it?
_
Hi,
could you send output from
g++ -v
?
Best regards,
Milan
Ewald Ertl píše v čt 12. 01. 2012 v 11:19 +0100:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile a simple C++ file on my OpenIndiana 151a with
> the g++ from the SFE repository.
>
> root@solewer:/usr/gcc/4.6# g++ --version
> g++ (GCC) 4.6.2
> C
In the scenario you are describing
An ssd should be faster
The reason it is not cut and dry is because you are comparing the spare
Bandwidth of your array which has possibly many
Spindles to the bandwidth of a single device. So it depends on how fast your
array is, how much spare bandwidth it h
Hi
you can also try:
export LD_NODIRECT=1
VirtualBox
Works for me.
Paolo
On 01/13/12 06:24 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
I did
env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib/amd64 /opt/VirtualBox/VirtualBox
i e I actually put that verbatim in the panel launcher, and now VirtualBox
works, and I have my
I did
env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib/amd64 /opt/VirtualBox/VirtualBox
i e I actually put that verbatim in the panel launcher, and now
VirtualBox works, and I have my Electronic id's accessible again
Thanks!
Partly for taking it seriously, and second for actually giving the exact
solut
Hello again,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Ewald Ertl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile a simple C++ file on my OpenIndiana 151a with
> the g++ from the SFE repository.
>
> root@solewer:/usr/gcc/4.6# g++ --version
> g++ (GCC) 4.6.2
> Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
the 9240 controller had the exact same problem spinning up the drives so i am
using the single r710 with 12 raid0's at the moment. i will likely stay with
this, but i may benchmark the other way for kicks.
From: Rich [rerc...@acm.jhu.edu]
Sent: Friday, Ja
Should do SATA 3 - I didn't think that SATA 3 speed for STP was an
optional part of the SAS 2.0 spec.
- Rich
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Grant Albitz wrote:
> My reasoning behind the dual controller was simply that each controller has
> 1gb of nvram cache and I figured the more the better
It may not be as cheap as some, but an Intel 320 series 80GB SSD is still well
under a hundred US dollars, and has full write protection in case of power
failures so sync writes (which is what a ZIL does all the time), are fast and
safe.
On 13 Jan 2012, at 11:56, Matt Connolly wrote:
> Ye
Yes, it is as you guess comparing ZIL on the main pool vs ZIL on an SSD. I
understand that the ZIL on its own is more of an integrity function rather than
a performance boost.
However, I would have expected some performance boost by using an SSD log
device since writing to the dedicated log de
13.01.2012 12:22, Geoff Nordli пишет:
Where do you see the firmware upgrade for that card? It is a built-in
SAS controller on the Supermicro X8DTH-6F board.
ftp://ftp.supermicro.com/driver/SAS/LSI/2008/IT/Firmware/
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing
>> PS: The reason I think of this, is I have a pool which is rather badly
>> balanced
>> due to a bad combination of little time and (at that moment) little zfs
>> knowledge,
>> so currently two VDEVs are >95% full, and AFAIK there's no way to fix that
>> except
>> (a) reconfigure everything or
Hi,
https://www.illumos.org/issues/1534
Best regards,
Milan
On 13.01.2012 09:42, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
My system has gcc (v4??) from OI-SFE installed, and gcc-3 from the oi
repository.
VirtualBox is of course installed from the VirtualBox official
package.
On 2012-01-12 21:42, openin
18 matches
Mail list logo
