If you weren't having any issues with speed and they've progressively
gotten worse, I'd look at dedup. If you're using dedup, you better make
sure you've got 2.5GB RAM for every TB of unique data you have, otherwise
you'll be swapping your dedup tables constantly and your read/write
performance is
On 02/11/2013 09:54 PM, Robbie Crash wrote:
If you weren't having any issues with speed and they've progressively
gotten worse, I'd look at dedup. If you're using dedup, you better make
sure you've got 2.5GB RAM for every TB of unique data you have, otherwise
you'll be swapping your dedup
On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:22 AM, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote:
Hi there,
would it be possible to compile your experience into some best practice
topic on the wiki - similarily to what Reginald has done for his N40L
installation? I think that would really help others as the subject is
richard.ell...@richardelling.com said:
Soon, many, if not all, HDDs will be shipped as self encrypting. AFAIK, there
is no OI project for managing the keys, however. I'm interested to know what
the demand for these tools might be.
-- richard
Hi Richard,
We have over 100 such disks
On 02/11/2013 11:51 PM, Marion Hakanson wrote:
richard.ell...@richardelling.com said:
Soon, many, if not all, HDDs will be shipped as self encrypting. AFAIK, there
is no OI project for managing the keys, however. I'm interested to know what
the demand for these tools might be.
-- richard
Hello all,
While setting up systems there are occasions when an SMF service
needs to be restarted - i.e. due to reconfiguration or its failure.
The svcadm restart action only takes place for online services.
I wonder if it is a reasonable RFE to add some command (and what
should it be
On 02/12/2013 12:12 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all,
While setting up systems there are occasions when an SMF service
needs to be restarted - i.e. due to reconfiguration or its failure.
The svcadm restart action only takes place for online services.
I wonder if it is a reasonable RFE
This is essentially what I argued for years ago, and I was pretty much
shot down. The response was basically a suggestion that I was being lazy
by only wanting to type one SMF command instead of two or three.
Rainer
On 2/11/2013 3:23 PM, Sas(o Kiselkov wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:12 AM, Jim
On 2013-02-12 00:23, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Just as a curious question, would a kick be functionally equivalent to
running the following 3 commands:
# svcadm clear fmri
# svcadm restart fmri
# svcadm enable fmri
In terms of such a simple chain, I'd position them in this order:
# svcadm restart
After another big clenup on home filer during which I got terrible
headache because of zfs-auto-snapshost, I decided to ask if anybody
tried to simplified snapshot management.
If a user could list all fs with zfs-auto weekly snapshots enabled, or
count them up or be able to enable other
On 2013-02-12 01:31, Rainer Heilke wrote:
This is essentially what I argued for years ago, and I was pretty much
shot down. The response was basically a suggestion that I was being lazy
by only wanting to type one SMF command instead of two or three.
I am sure I am not unique in my laziness,
I am going to offer to obvious advice...
How full is your pool? Zpool performance degrades as the pool fills up and
the tools don't tell you how close you are to the cliff -- you find the
cliff on your own by falling off of it. As a rule of thumb, I keep
production system less than 70%
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Roman Naumenko ro...@naumenko.ca wrote:
After another big clenup on home filer during which I got terrible headache
because of zfs-auto-snapshost, I decided to ask if anybody tried to
simplified snapshot management.
I think everyone has slightly different
Jan Owoc said the following, on 11-02-13 8:35 PM:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Roman Naumenko ro...@naumenko.ca wrote:
After another big clenup on home filer during which I got terrible headache
because of zfs-auto-snapshost, I decided to ask if anybody tried to
simplified snapshot
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Roman Naumenko ro...@naumenko.ca wrote:
Jan Owoc said the following, on 11-02-13 8:35 PM:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Roman Naumenko ro...@naumenko.ca wrote:
After another big clenup on home filer during which I got terrible
headache
because of
So it looks like re-distribution issue. Initially there were two Vdev with
24 disks ( disk 0-23 ) for close to year. After which which we added 24
more disks and created additional vdevs. The initial vdevs are filled up
and so write speed declined. Now how to find files that are present in a
16 matches
Mail list logo
