Can that confusion happen at the start of a word or only inside words??
And how many rulebreaking words are there, can they be enumerated??
On 2013-03-12 22:50, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 03/12/2013 10:10 PM, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:02:27PM +0100, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
I'm
Hello!
My normal procedure includes recursive snapshot/send/receive of whole zone
dataset. Problems may arise if the zone is not installed from scratch but
cloned instead or if there are some time-slider snapshots behind it.
To get back to your question: zone (zfs) dataset needs zoned flag and fla
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:01:16AM +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
> Can that confusion happen at the start of a word or only inside
> words?? And how many rulebreaking words are there, can they be
> enumerated??
It can happen only in the middle. Only in a case when the word is constructed
from t
not such an easy thing then...
however. I suppose given a complete dictionary, a system could try
splitting a word between c and h and see if the resulting subwords are
in the dictionary. Hmm
On 2013-03-13 08:57, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:01:16AM +0100, Hans J. Albertsson
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:04:43AM +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
> not such an easy thing then...
>
> however. I suppose given a complete dictionary, a system could try
> splitting a word between c and h and see if the resulting subwords
> are in the dictionary. Hmm
Sometimes they might not be
I remember taking a course in Latvian, when the teacher proudly
announced that all of 3.5 million people spoke it world wide.
I suppose she had Livian to compare with, 300 or so, these days..
Swedish is a BIG language: 9 million here, 2 million speak east swedish,
and then about a million in t
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
> A Q about the Slovak language: while you were in a union with the
> Czechs, did the languages start to unify spontaneously? I mean like
> vocabulary changes, minor grammatical drift, spelling oddities
> changing and so on and so
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:17:51AM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
> > A Q about the Slovak language: while you were in a union with the
> > Czechs, did the languages start to unify spontaneously? I mean like
> > vocabulary changes, m
I made upgrade the OmniOS to bloody version.
pkg://omnios/storage/stmf@0.5.11,5.11-0.151005:20130311T155835Z
The problem still persist
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/open
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Ram Chander wrote:
> iSCSI acts in network layer ( layer 3) and is IP dependent whereas AOE acts
> in ethernet layer. Aoe is much fatser compared to iSCSI. Correct me if am
> wrong.
BTW, we have some AoE code (client side) in illumos-nexenta
which you can try on
Is this result really reasonable???
I would have expected Å Ä Ö å ä ö to be classified as alpha in this
locale
hans@klaus%81%15:37> locale
LANG=sv_SE.ISO8859-15
LC_CTYPE="sv_SE.ISO8859-15"
LC_NUMERIC="sv_SE.ISO8859-15"
LC_TIME="sv_SE.ISO8859-15"
LC_COLLATE="sv_SE.ISO8859-15"
LC_MONETARY
On 03/13/13 10:40, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
> Is this result really reasonable???
> I would have expected Å Ä Ö å ä ö to be classified as alpha in this
> locale
>
>
>
>
>
> hans@klaus%81%15:37> locale
> LANG=sv_SE.ISO8859-15
> LC_CTYPE="sv_SE.ISO8859-15"
> LC_NUMERIC="sv_SE.ISO8859-15"
>
Hi:
I was reading the manpage of lofiadm
(http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19082-01/819-2240/lofiadm-1m/index.html)
and the crypto-algo it supports are aes-128-cbc, aes-192-cbc,
aes-256-cbc, des3-cbc, blowfish-cbc.
And cbc is reportedly vulnerable to watermarking attack
(http://security.stackexchange.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
