ZFS is great to manage backend storage in a SAN environment. So then you're
likely to use 10GigE, or Infiniband as the transport...
I only recently discovered SAS SFF-8088. Gives you 4x 6Gbit buses yielding 24
Gbit with very low overhead, low cost. A lot of performance for the buck.
I also r
Jim,
Thanks for this add; will be very useful.
We're finding zone startup to be wildly variable, even without all the concerns
around interdependencies. It often devolves into a manual process.
Lou Picciano
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Klimov"
To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
Hello all,
While testing my works on SMF inter-dependencies (such as with my
recent write-up on SMFization of local zones), I discovered that if
I run svcadm restart, then the dependency service (a zone) stops
first, and only when its state changes to "offline", the dependent
services (zones) b
Hi,
well, i didn't measured anything, that is just my 'impression'...
And it behaves very stable (didn't had any kind of crash, since 4.2.8).
I have moved into '/hipster' repository (so, not production level at
all) and since Hipster has often updates, do not take my statement as
something ser
Works well for me other than not being able to boot iPXE. 4.3 goes to
GURU meditation with iPXE. But it does it on all platforms. Windows and
Linux.
Mike
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 15:43 +0100, Predrag Zecevic [Unix Systems
Administrator] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> well, i didn't measured anything, that is j
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:27:42PM +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:
>
> While testing my works on SMF inter-dependencies (such as with my
> recent write-up on SMFization of local zones), I discovered that if
> I run svcadm restart, then the dependency service (a zone) stops
> first, and only when its st
Thanks for a response, replies inline.
On 2013-11-18 20:02, Gary Mills wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:27:42PM +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:
While testing my works on SMF inter-dependencies (such as with my
recent write-up on SMFization of local zones), I discovered that if
I run svcadm restar
In message <528a74a1.7010...@cos.ru>, Jim Klimov writes:
>Yes, of course. Being a service under its local zone's SMF control,
>the database starts and stops correctly. And so does the appserver
>in its zone. The problem is that when the appserver-zone depends on
>the database-zone, and I do "svcadm
Has anyone already got VNC working in a zone?
I ended up with an error for gdm.
[ID 702911 daemon.warning] inetd_offline method for instance
svc:/application/x11/xvnc-inetd:default is unspecified. Taking default
action: kill.
State: offline since Mon Nov 18 17:06:38 2013
Reason: Dependency svc:
On 2013-11-18 21:22, John D Groenveld wrote:
In message <528a74a1.7010...@cos.ru>, Jim Klimov writes:
Yes, of course. Being a service under its local zone's SMF control,
the database starts and stops correctly. And so does the appserver
in its zone. The problem is that when the appserver-zone de
On 2013-11-18 04:45, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all,
If you were ever annoyed by having all zones starting and stopping
as a wild herd on a stampede, while you want them to be orchestrated
in a particular order? Then check this out:
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Zones+as+SMF+services
Thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
