I have a production system so I should have tried this at the weekend but is it
a 3 way mirror across 7 vdevs (is that the right term), see below.
I started of the resilver yesterday, but it is have too much of a performance
penalty on of the of VMWARE windows machines. I tried to reduce the pri
Hi,
Have you checked:
https://www.google.nl/#q=zfs+resilver+priority+openindiana&safe=off
http://broken.net/uncategorized/zfs-performance-tuning-for-scrubs-and-resilvers/
Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet,
Serge Fonville
http://www.sergefonville.nl
2014-06-05 12:05 GMT+02:00 John McEntee :
On 05/06/2014 12:05, John McEntee wrote:
I have a production system so I should have tried this at the weekend but is it
a 3 way mirror across 7 vdevs (is that the right term), see below.
I started of the resilver yesterday, but it is have too much of a performance
penalty on of the of VMWARE
> Have you checked:
Yes
> https://www.google.nl/#q=zfs+resilver+priority+openindiana&safe=off
None of those told me how to stop it in the background
> http://broken.net/uncategorized/zfs-performance-tuning-for-scrubs-and-resilvers/
This is where I got
echo zfs_resilver_delay/w8 | mdb -kw
ec
I think the only way to stop a resilver is to remove the vdev that is
currently being resilvered. In your case you should
zfs remove c1t5000CCA225C03FC0d0
I don't know of any other way to stop a resilver
Cheers,
budy
Am 05.06.14 12:05, schrieb John McEntee:
I have a production system so I sh
Thanks for your response but the zpool scrub -s stops a (generally user
initiated) scrub, not a resilver from a hard disk replacement.
-Original Message-
From: Udo Grabowski (IMK) [mailto:udo.grabow...@kit.edu]
Sent: 05 June 2014 11:52
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [O
On 05/06/2014 12:05, John McEntee wrote:
I have a production system so I should have tried this at the weekend but is it
a 3 way mirror across 7 vdevs (is that the right term), see below.
I started of the resilver yesterday, but it is have too much of a performance
penalty on of the of VMWARE
> zfs remove c1t5000CCA225C03FC0d0
This works on only inactive hot spares, cache, top-level, or log devices can
be removed
I have done a
zfs detach tank c1t5000CCA225C03FC0d0
but the pool is still trying to resilver even to a missing device ( I suppose I
could pull it out, may try that on
>This is what we use in /etc/system :
>
> set zfs:zfs_resilver_delay = 0
> set zfs:zfs_scrub_delay = 0
> set zfs:zfs_top_maxinflight = 128
> set zfs:zfs_resilver_min_time_ms = 5000
>
> Resilver went down from 14 days for a 2 TB disk to 7 hours.
Currently the backups overnight have a higher load t
On 05/06/2014 13:22, John McEntee wrote:
This is what we use in /etc/system :
set zfs:zfs_resilver_delay = 0
set zfs:zfs_scrub_delay = 0
set zfs:zfs_top_maxinflight = 128
set zfs:zfs_resilver_min_time_ms = 5000
Resilver went down from 14 days for a 2 TB disk to 7 hours.
Currently the backups
10 matches
Mail list logo
