[OpenIndiana-discuss] New OI /dev release, release structure

2014-10-02 Thread Nikola M.
On 09/28/14 04:40 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: Hopefully some kind person with necessary knowlege and access will push an updated bash package which works on 151a8/9 so that servers based on OpenIndiana are no longer a disaster situation. It would imply that OI servers have automatic updates turn

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-10-02 Thread outsider
Has anyone tried to install the patched BASH version of https://unixpackages.com [1] ? It installs to a different location then the OI Bash and gives an error : bash --version ld.so.1: bash: fatal: libintl.so.8: open failed: No such file or directory Killed does anyone have a solution fo

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-10-02 Thread Brandon Hume
On 26/09/2014 8:47 PM, Gary Gendel wrote: The current maintainer says it's been in bash for ~20 years, why it's not in Solaris 10 is a mystery. It is in Solaris 10. (And 11.) The test being used is flawed: env X="() { :;} ; echo busted" /bin/sh -c "echo completed" This just tests whethe

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-10-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Brandon Hume wrote: On 26/09/2014 8:47 PM, Gary Gendel wrote: The current maintainer says it's been in bash for ~20 years, why it's not in Solaris 10 is a mystery. It is in Solaris 10. (And 11.) The test being used is flawed: env X="() { :;} ; echo busted" /bin/sh -c

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-10-02 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 10/ 2/14 07:20 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Brandon Hume wrote: On 26/09/2014 8:47 PM, Gary Gendel wrote: The current maintainer says it's been in bash for ~20 years, why it's not in Solaris 10 is a mystery. It is in Solaris 10. (And 11.) The test being used is flawed:

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-10-02 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 10/ 2/14 07:00 AM, Brandon Hume wrote: On many (most? all?) Linuxes, /bin/sh *is* /bin/bash. Many, but not all - the Debian family and some others use a lighter weight, POSIX compatible shell instead, dash, the Debian Almquist Shell; and many embedded distros use BusyBox instead. https://e

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New OI /dev release, release structure

2014-10-02 Thread ken mays via openindiana-discuss
And we need SOME release structure for /dev , made of people willing to do that, *starting with people who last time produced /dev and under their guidance* (and using latest updates in Hipster, that could be used, without breaking dependencies and production process and intoducing new bugs) Fo

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New OI /dev release, release structure

2014-10-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Nikola M. wrote: On 09/28/14 04:40 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: Hopefully some kind person with necessary knowlege and access will push an updated bash package which works on 151a8/9 so that servers based on OpenIndiana are no longer a disaster situation. It would imply that

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-10-02 Thread outsider
It is very strange with the oracle updates for Solaris 10 & 11 Is far as I can see, Solaris 10 and Solaris 11 get different bash versions after the patch. I don't know what is allowed to say about it in public, but both test negative on the (simple) shockshell tests I found. (so they seem secure

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New OI /dev release, release structure

2014-10-02 Thread ken mays via openindiana-discuss
Hipster provided the recent kernel builds and updates from the upstream consolidations. We had discussed hipster as being oi-151a10. /dev is just a timestamp on a snapshot. A Hipster snapshot can replace /dev once the major consolidations are successfully built and tested. Hipster is like upgr

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New OI /dev release, release structure

2014-10-02 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hello. Bob Friesenhahn писал 02.10.2014 23:43: On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Nikola M. wrote: On 09/28/14 04:40 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: Hopefully some kind person with necessary knowlege and access will push an updated bash package which works on 151a8/9 so that servers based on OpenIndiana are no

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-10-02 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 10/ 2/14 01:37 PM, outsider wrote: It is very strange with the oracle updates for Solaris 10 & 11 Is far as I can see, Solaris 10 and Solaris 11 get different bash versions after the patch. They had different bash versions before the patch too. Upstream released fixes for bash versions fro

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New OI /dev release, release structure

2014-10-02 Thread outsider
It would also be nice to see a split between home-usage and (partial) professional usage. For the way I use OpenIndiana I don't need a GUI, nor firefox nor codecs or movie players. I just need a good, stable and secure platform with zones and ZFS. And capable of being patchable to the latest a

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New OI /dev release, release structure

2014-10-02 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hello. outsider писал 03.10.2014 01:26: It would also be nice to see a split between home-usage and (partial) professional usage. What do you mean by "split"? We are aimed to support both server and desktop installations. If you want server-focused distribution, you can look at DilOS (uses