Does anyone have anything beyond own impressions and war stories?
Is anyone collecting statistics on storage solutions sold?
Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5
Den 12 jan 2015 15:24 skrev Schweiss, Chip c...@innovates.com:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Andrew Gabriel
Nexenta alone is probably around an Exabyte of licensed installations,
and that's a mix of displaced traditional storage vendors, and new
growth in old and new companies. There are many ZFS-based storage
vendors in addition to Nexenta. The traditional 'big 8' storage vendors
charged $9B for
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Andrew Gabriel
illu...@cucumber.demon.co.uk wrote:
Since you mention Sun/Oracle, I don't see them pushing ZFS very much
anymore, although I am aware their engineers still work on it.
Oracle pushes ZFS hard and aggressively. I dare you to fill out their
I use this with the urtwn v0.8.1 driver (vid=0x7392 pid=0x7811)
Am 12.01.15 schrieb Hanno Hirschberger hannohirschber...@googlemail.com:
Hello everyone,
in the WiFi section of the OI wiki is a list of Other supported WiFi
devices [1] and there is also the Edimax EW-7811Un [2] listed.
Thanks for your views, the serial storage (tape mostly?) problem is news to
me but otherwise I concur.
I was mostly asking about success and market presence, i e is ZFS being
widely used in any non-Sun/Oracle part of the workplace?
Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5
Den 12 jan 2015 12:38 skrev
most NAS systems that I've come across recently fall into 2 systems:
1) ZFS
2) Hardware RAID
there don't appear to be any other alternatives out there, and for my money
I wouldn't ever go back to hardware RAID, if the controller fails you can
lose everything!
We're not a Sun company, although
Hello everyone,
in the WiFi section of the OI wiki is a list of Other supported WiFi
devices [1] and there is also the Edimax EW-7811Un [2] listed.
I've got that USB WiFi adapter and want to used it on my OpenIndiana
server box to create a wireless access point for my mobile devices.
But after
I know FreeNAS has turned to ZFS only, OSv is ZFS only, and NAS
Appliances running ZFS turn up in unexpected places, but is it really
anything like an even half-baked success, at least of sorts???
A friend (long time, extremely irritating acquantance) claims ZFS is a
complete failure, and
ZFS is the most advanced filesystem on the planet IMHO, we have been using
it for 10+ years in production.
There are reasons not to use it, but they are usually limitations not
related to ZFS itself.
We used to use tape backup for our old UFS systems, and it came as a shock
when we couldn't use
Couple of points and counter points from my own experience.
*) tape really isn't dead. No, really. at about $.01/GB/copy, and 1x10^20
bit error rate, you can't beat it. Use it for the right thing though. This
excels as an offline archival media with media lifetimes expected at around
30 years.
Hi, Everyone
I have a wacom tablet: wacom intuos pen small(CTL-480/S)
But when i plugged this usb, this system looks like to detected this
device, but this device still not work. Can anyone help me? Thanks a lot.
This is dmesg msgs:
Jan 13 04:59:49 solaris usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] Wacom
Schweiss, Chip wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Andrew Gabriel
illu...@cucumber.demon.co.uk wrote:
Since you mention Sun/Oracle, I don't see them pushing ZFS very much
anymore, although I am aware their engineers still work on it.
Oracle pushes ZFS hard and aggressively. I
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Hans J Albertsson
hans.j.alberts...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your views, the serial storage (tape mostly?) problem is news to
me but otherwise I concur.
While you can always zfs send the filesystem to a tape, it's not
recommended to do this sort of thing
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com
wrote:
ZFS is the most advanced filesystem on the planet IMHO, we have been using
it for 10+ years in production.
+1
There is some fragmentation, Solaris 11 has an incompatible version of ZFS,
at least for now.
In the
14 matches
Mail list logo
